Tesco/Asda Pricechecker Thread - part 5

neas

Dr.Who-Who wrote: »

Hey Neas, somebody posted your posts here on pts :rotfl::rotfl: you are famous!!! And you got stalker too:rotfl::rotfl:

Yes and they trying to paint it in a bad light. Nobody cared about that website so i posted it here.

not bothered though, if i get banned for posting links then its a bit OTT. We will see . might go and reply.

scotsgirl_3

madmuppet5 wrote: »

I've always copied and pasted all the details for my shop from the SS into notepad. Works for me
Can't believe people are whingeing about the brilliant spreadsheet. :A
Although I do find the lack of colour a little disconcerting :rotfl:

I did threaten to make it pink and purple but I think the guy editors might have killed me

teresa555

why is everyone in deep discussion about the spreadsheet when we haven't even got a voucher to buy items from it lol

*Scottish*Lass*

grandprix wrote: »

Oh, you are so kind, thank you very much for doing that (really mean it). Now the ungrateful bit - it's horrible, formatting etc. & I'm lazy, so why don't the SS editors just allow the "live" one to be downloaded ?

Because it means someone having to take 'shots' of it several times a day - adding more work for them

Yes the formatting is a bit pants on excel but it takes seconds to fix. Ctrl a again then lengthen box A. On number 1 move the line up to make the box smaller. All will do the same when you do that.

Delete the columns you don't need.

A lot less work for us to do it ourselves than for the SS editors to have to do even more work

grandprix

scotsgirl wrote: »

I did threaten to make it pink and purple but I think the guy editors might have killed me

Dear Scotsgirl, can you explain why we are not allowed to download the "live" spreadsheet ?

skintlass

teresa555 wrote: »

why is everyone in deep discussion about the spreadsheet when we haven't even got a voucher to buy items from it lol

I have 4 vouchers off the bank holiday weekend waiting for me to print out and use as the offers just haven't been good enough today .

FloFlo

celebrate wrote: »

HELLO:wave::wave::wave::wave::wave::wave::wave:PTS

CAN YOU TELL ME WHY I'M NOT ALLOWED TO VIEW YOUR SITE PLEASE :mad::mad:

Lol, if some of us had our way you wouldn't be able to view this thread.:p

ninjapav

grandprix wrote: »

I'm not spending £400 quid on one of those "phones" ! It would wipe my profits out.

N20Y1D wrote: »

No need to do that, they arent on about an iphone, you can do it on handsets available for well under £100 - 64.99 in fact (thanks to tryn2help on hukd)


Orange San Francisco - £79.99 Including £10 Top Up @ Orange

Don't know if it's already been posted but I just got an OSF for £79.99 and it included a free £10 top-up, making the phone just £69.99 (that's the cheapest I've seen it). UPDATE: It now seems that some people are getting the phone for £74,99 - and the top-up making it £64,99!

I called Orange sales on 0800 801080 and gave them the number on the back of an old Orange sim card. The salesperson told me the phone was £109 but he could let me have it for £79.99 and the price included a free £10 top up (and free delivery).

Got the phone today, called Orange on 0800 079 0006, they took some details then told me the £10 will be added in 2-3 working days. UPDATE; Money is on the phone today - much quicker than they said it would take.

Funnily enough, this is exactly the phone I used when testing the custom barcode scanner suggested by Jodie+Matt!

rose28454

Many thanks to all the peeps working on the Spreadsheet and everyone posting updates. Great job. Now shall we stop bickering because we have not got any vouchers.

grandprix

*Scottish*Lass* wrote: »

Because it means someone having to take 'shots' of it several times a day - adding more work for them

Yes the formatting is a bit pants on excel but it takes seconds to fix. Ctrl a again then lengthen box A. On number 1 move the line up to make the box smaller. All will do the same when you do that.

Delete the columns you don't need.

A lot less work for us to do it ourselves than for the SS editors to have to do even more work

I don't think this is correct. Or Google is a bit lame ? If I am editing a document then a "read only" person should be able to take a copy even if there are edits pending. Come on computer science students tell us about "locks and commit cycles".