Ticket from TPS

Oopsadaisy

meames wrote: »

Not sure what I have written that prompted this response. As I have already stated I appreciate any advice and was just asking questions I have no point stated that I know better. I don't, that is why I am asking. I just want to cover all bases and check all sources.

You asked a question and every single reply said ignore.

In stead of saying 'Thanks everyone, I've read the stickies and will pursue your recommended course of [in]action' you then started talking about 'but they've broken a contract' etc. This merely serves to confuse/cloud the issue.

It's like people who say 'I know everyone says ignore and don't appeal and I've read all the advice saying ignore and don't appeal but do you think I should appeal anyway'.

meames_2

Oopsadaisy wrote: »

You asked a question and every single reply said ignore.

In stead of saying 'Thanks everyone, I've read the stickies and will pursue your recommended course of [in]action' you then started talking about 'but they've broken a contract' etc. This merely serves to confuse/cloud the issue.

Actually that wasn't what I said. I said I had broken the contract. So would that lead to...etc...etc...

From what I read from the stickies I obviously interpreted it incorrectly or read into things that aren't there. Then my imagination worked overtime and imagined allsorts of scenarios that could happen.

Oopsadaisy wrote: »

It's like people who say 'I know everyone says ignore and don't appeal and I've read all the advice saying ignore and don't appeal but do you think I should appeal anyway'.

I think this happens because people want more and more reassurance. Not saying it is right but it is understandable.

Again thank everyone for their help and again I appreciate it.

meames_2

hI
Recieved letter 2 from TPS

Yoiur vechile was recorded parked on our cloients private poroprty at company from time to time and date and remained there for 1 hour 20 mins.

A notice was sent to you on date which gave you 28 days to pay the ful parking charge or challenge it issue.

The amount of £!00 is now due.

If payment is not recieved in 14 days an additional admin charge will be incurred.

Failure to pay the full balence outstanding within 14 days of the date of this notice could result in the balence outstanding being registrerdd as a debt agaist you. You will become liable for additional costs and interest involved. Your ability to obyain credit in future could be affected.

WE ARE HOLDING PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE ON FILE TO SUPPORT THIS CLAIM.

Coupon-mad

And your point is? It's exactly as we advised it would be, the letters are well known and we gave you a link to look at them. There's no need to type out what we already have in our link.

You are wasting your life on this, just file the rubbish till they give up. Hope you get it now that this is a scam and you just need to ignore them, like a phishing email series?

meames_2

sorry, page submitted before I finished typing. I'm ignoring it. I would add to the upload thread but I can't scan them in.

The letter I have does look different to the ones listed.

Just wanted to inform the 2nd letter wording, seeing I have 6 to go!

meames_2

I have recieved my first letter from Debt Recovery Plus, it is different from the ones posted on the sticky thread.

It has sent me into a real panic, especially as the price has gone up to £148.99.

How many more can I expect?

Coupon-mad

meames wrote: »

I have recieved my first letter from Debt Recovery Plus, it is different from the ones posted on the sticky thread.

It has sent me into a real panic, especially as the price has gone up to £148.99.

How many more can I expect?

Panic not! Look closer at the letter for the use of vague rubbish like 'we will now refer it to the next desk along which may result in all sorts of old rubbish' type threats...

In what way is it 'different' than all the versions of DRP letters on that top thread? Don't just look at the PPC letter-chain of 'your' company, look at all the others who also use DRP, there are various DRP letters (all utter codswallop).

If it is very different than every other DRP letter we have shown on that top thread, listed under every PPC, then you may want to show us the letter (digital photo picture with all ID blanked off, no date, no ref numbers).

But I would be amazed if it doesn't match a known letter on that thread, if so then the only conclusion would be that they have re-jigged the wording as not enough people are falling for the standard guff. If so then that's a good thing as it shows forums like this are working.

meames_2

No scanner at the mo

We act on behalf of TPS parking soloutions

Our client has written to you previously explaining that your veichle was parked in breach of the agreed terms and conditions regarding parking on their clients private land.

It is essential that payment is made to us within 7 days of the date of this letter. If you are having difficulty making the payment the please contact our office on 999999999 to discuss your proposal for payment.

We area member of the British Parking Association (BPA) and its Approved Operator Scheme and we adhere it its code of practice. Aas the registered keeper it is important that you inform us immediatley if you have sold/hired the car. Or if you werre not the driver, that you could provide us with the name and address of the person who was driving the vehicle at the relevant time. This is important so we can avoid pursuing the wrong person.

The BPA code of practice states that "the courts do not look favourablyon motorists or consumers who try to withhold information from opereators when it has been asked for with genuine, reasonable and proper cause".

Accordingly, if we do not recieve full payment or contact from you with your proposal for payment, this matter may be passed to our solicitor to commence County Court proceddings.

Alray quote our reference xxxxx on all correspondance regarding this matter. If you have made a payment since the date of this letter the please ignore this reminder.

funkycoldribena

meames wrote: »

No scanner at the mo

We act on behalf of TPS parking soloutions

Our client has written to you previously explaining that your veichle was parked in breach of the agreed terms and conditions regarding parking on their clients private land.

It is essential that payment is made to us within 7 days of the date of this letter. If you are having difficulty making the payment the please contact our office on 999999999 to discuss your proposal for payment.

We area member of the British Parking Association (BPA) and its Approved Operator Scheme and we adhere it its code of practice. Aas the registered keeper it is important that you inform us immediatley if you have sold/hired the car. Or if you werre not the driver, that you could provide us with the name and address of the person who was driving the vehicle at the relevant time. This is important so we can avoid pursuing the wrong person.

The BPA code of practice states that "the courts do not look favourablyon motorists or consumers who try to withhold information from opereators when it has been asked for with genuine, reasonable and proper cause".

Accordingly, if we do not recieve full payment or contact from you with your proposal for payment, this matter may be passed to our solicitor to commence County Court proceddings.

Alray quote our reference xxxxx on all correspondance regarding this matter. If you have made a payment since the date of this letter the please ignore this reminder.

Blah,blah,standard fare,blah,blah,ignore,waste of time typing it all out,ignore,ignore.

Coupon-mad

meames wrote: »

No scanner at the mo

We act on behalf of TPS parking soloutions

Our client has written to you previously explaining that your veichle was parked in breach of the agreed terms and conditions regarding parking on their clients private land.

It is essential that payment is made to us within 7 days of the date of this letter. If you are having difficulty making the payment the please contact our office on 999999999 to discuss your proposal for payment.

We area member of the British Parking Association (BPA) and its Approved Operator Scheme and we adhere it its code of practice. Aas the registered keeper it is important that you inform us immediatley if you have sold/hired the car. Or if you werre not the driver, that you could provide us with the name and address of the person who was driving the vehicle at the relevant time. This is important so we can avoid pursuing the wrong person.

The BPA code of practice states that "the courts do not look favourablyon motorists or consumers who try to withhold information from opereators when it has been asked for with genuine, reasonable and proper cause".

Accordingly, if we do not recieve full payment or contact from you with your proposal for payment, this matter may be passed to our solicitor to commence County Court proceddings.

Always quote our reference xxxxx on all correspondence regarding this matter. If you have made a payment since the date of this letter please ignore this reminder.

That letter says nothing at all, it's so tame it's not even threatening!

If anything it's a dumbed-down version of their usual efforts. Looks a bit like this one only with the misleading stuff about Bailiffs etc removed.

I wonder if there has been one complaint too many to the OfT? Are DRP running scared of following Roxburghe into the 'under threat of having their licence revoked' category? Or indeed have they been warned?

It's such a pathetic letter you could hardly call it a threatogram! :T