We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Bullish Bulls have been calling the "Soft Landing" every year since 2002.
Comments
-
I know. Sitting here, friendless, single, not as clever or wealthy as you..
Don't be too hard on yourself you might be as wealthy as him, it's at least possible.Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
chucknorris wrote: »Don't be too hard on yourself you might be as wealthy as him, it's at least possible.
I believe he's actually a lot wealthier.
Therefore, obviously, a parasite.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »I believe he's actually a lot wealthier.
I think you missed the pointChuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
chucknorris wrote: »Don't be too hard on yourself you might be as wealthy as him, it's at least possible.
Thanks, the thought that I might be as wealthy as him has cheered me up. <Sarcasm>
The problem is, I don't know how wealthy he is, all I have got to go on is by what he types here, and I have found that plenty of what he does type is false.30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »I believe he's actually a lot wealthier.
Therefore, obviously, a parasite.
Ouch.
Just bought a new TV (large), doesn't that exclude me from parasitic behaviour ?
It was bought with saved money, BTW.30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.0 -
-
Graham_Devon wrote: »Yes then. Parasite.
If, on the other hand, you were paying it off over 36 years, you may have been relieved of your status.
Even though it isn't LED ?30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.0 -
Thanks, the thought that I might be as wealthy as him has cheered me up. <Sarcasm>
The problem is, I don't know how wealthy he is, all I have got to go on is by what he types here, and I have found that plenty of what he does type is false.
Its like I've said before.
The fact that RenovationMan, Hamish et al are regularly compelled to tell everyone how well off they are is much more interesting than the announcements themselves.
From a pop psychology perspective it does reek of overcompensation.0 -
Its like I've said before.
The fact that RenovationMan, Hamish et al are regularly compelled to tell everyone how well off they are is much more interesting than the announcements themselves.
From a pop psychology perspective it does reek of overcompensation.
Exactly. If I were as "wealthy" as they claim to be, I don't think I'd be here telling everyone about it. I might be here debating and having some banter, but it seems a bit crude when they start waving their wad in front of you. I have as much respect for a wealthy person (and I have dealt with a few very wealthy people) and anyone else. When a wealthy (or self proclaimed wealthy) person starts flaunting it, it isn't pretty.
Reminds me of a certain Harry Enfield character from the past.30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.0 -
Exactly. If I were as "wealthy" as they claim to be, I don't think I'd be here telling everyone about it. I might be here debating and having some banter, but it seems a bit crude when they start waving their wad in front of you. I have as much respect for a wealthy person (and I have dealt with a few very wealthy people) and anyone else. When a wealthy (or self proclaimed wealthy) person starts flaunting it, it isn't pretty.
Reminds me of a certain Harry Enfield character from the past.
What happens on an internet forum may not be what people would disclose in direct communication.
I'm happy to discuss things far more openly in here than I would in real life.:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards