We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Whats wrong with people?
Comments
-
vikingaero wrote: »The 40 Brigade are always right. They've never had an accident in years of driving - except those they caused in their rear view mirror.Not their problem..
Stupid remark. Of course it is their problem if they have caused an accident.0 -
DirectDebacle wrote: »Stupid remark. Of course it is their problem if they have caused an accident.
Chill out, I meant they will think that it isn't their problem.0 -
-
I knew the relative peace and quiet wouldn't last long, threads like this always cause controversy“I may not agree with you, but I will defend to the death your right to make an a** of yourself.”
<><><><><><><><><<><><><><><><><><><><><><> Don't forget to like and subscribe \/ \/ \/0 -
DirectDebacle wrote: »Why? Is that what you would think?
Do I have to spell it out for you?
They will look in their mirror, see an accident that they have caused/contributed to and drive blindly on thinking to themselves, Oh dear, " not my problem " .. as they continue their journey.0 -
Then you enter a whole new ballgame when you have (like our company are now doing) big beefy incident responce vehicles - like Toyota Hi-Lux 4x4's - restricted to 56mph.Signaller, author, father, carer.0
-
So thisNot their problem..
has now been elaborated to mean thisDo I have to spell it out for you?
They will look in their mirror, see an accident that they have caused/contributed to and drive blindly on thinking to themselves, Oh dear, " not my problem " .. as they continue their journey.
You need to try to express yourself more clearly in future, otherwise it appears you are posting twaddle.:D0 -
DirectDebacle wrote: »So this
has now been elaborated to mean this
You need to try to express yourself more clearly in future, otherwise it appears you are posting twaddle.:D
The only problem with this site was the removal of the "rolleyes" smiley which was used to indicate sarcasm and/or dumbass.The man without a signature.0 -
vikingaero wrote: »The only problem with this site was the removal of the "rolleyes" smiley which was used to indicate sarcasm and/or dumbass.The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits. - Einstein0
-
DirectDebacle wrote: »So this
has now been elaborated to mean this
You need to try to express yourself more clearly in future, otherwise it appears you are posting twaddle.:D
As I said before, you need to chill out, I agree with Vikingaero, the " sarcasm " smiley should never have been removed from here.
You need to take time and think is there another way of reading in to this, before blasting off.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards