Japan crisis - the worlds economic outlook?

Poshbird

In the first min of part 2 here Dr Busby says this is far worse than and dwarfs Chernobyl and the cancer yield from this dwarfs the million plus dead from that disaster.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZszDrDfL5A

Interesting its the harmful particles that are more dangerous than the radiation. A tent or dome should have been put over Fukishema already like the French want to put over Chernobyl because that is still dangerous after 25yrs.

ninky_2

Poshbird wrote: »

So any way nicky you did not answer my question as to are the 2 or 3 men who had radiation burns on their legs still alive?

perhaps because your self selected moniker - combined with your inability to get mine right - makes communication with you about as seductive as a threeway with nick griffin and ann widdicombe.

giving into pester power just this once......

if you read back you will see that the fukushima 50 are not actually 50 but around 500 working on shifts. i've no idea if the men who had radiation burns died - or whether any of the other workers have. i'd say given the levels of radiation they were exposed to there is a significant chance they may have died or be very unwell.

next time you offer me your rather unpalatable conversational cake can i suggest you dress it with icing - or at least a cherry. even a witty insult would do. well it works for bendix.

bendix

Poshbird wrote: »

So any way nicky you did not answer my question as to are the 2 or 3 men who had radiation burns on their legs still alive? If so did they get to save their legs? How many have died so far as a result of radiation? What are the projected death tolls for the next 10-25 years? In many ways this is already worse than Chernobyl, and death toll is now in the millions over 25 years.

Honestly, what an obsessive you are.

If you read the attached, it states that the two men suffered burns but were released after a couple of days of treatment.

But as it's reported in the Daily Telegraph rather than the Alex Jones Nutter Hour, you will obviously retort that it's an Illuminati inspired fudge job, that the water did, in fact, eat their flesh through to their bones and that they are dead.

But that it doesnt matter anyway, because they were Reptilians and - oh - in case you're wondering what to do as a result of this conspiracy, BUY SILVER.

Etc etc ad nauseum.

Poshbird

ninky wrote: »

perhaps because your self selected moniker - combined with your inability to get mine right - makes communication with you about as seductive as a threeway with nick griffin and ann widdicombe.

giving into pester power just this once......

if you read back you will see that the fukushima 50 are not actually 50 but around 500 working on shifts. i've no idea if the men who had radiation burns died - or whether any of the other workers have. i'd say given the levels of radiation they were exposed to there is a significant chance they may have died or be very unwell.

next time you offer me your rather unpalatable conversational cake can i suggest you dress it with icing - or at least a cherry. even a witty insult would do. well it works for bendix.

Ha very ninky good post unlike the garbage that was Bendix post above.

Serious question, do you think it will be safer to bring kids to Tokyo when they have put some kind of dome over it?

Do these particles found in Tokyo like cesium 137 stay there, or will they get less harmful in the short term?

wotsthat

Poshbird wrote: »

Do these particles found in Tokyo like cesium 137 stay there, or will they get less harmful in the short term?

Why don't you do some proper research on the subject instead of consulting youtube and a random stranger on an internet forum.

Poshbird

wotsthat wrote: »

Why don't you do some proper research on the subject instead of consulting youtube and a random stranger on an internet forum.

Yeah mate, trying to. There are so many lies though, how do you know what is the truth.

Like when they denied meltdown and now it turns out it was a cover up.

vivatifosi

Poshbird wrote: »

Like when they denied meltdown and now it turns out it was a cover up.

What cover up? The tsunami occurred on March 11th. Stories of a potential melt-down started on about March 15th, after the explosions. They couldn't confirm a meltdown at a site which they couldn't get near as it was conjecture, but even then TEPCO said a meltdown could not be ruled out. How is this a cover up?

I'm not a TEPCO apologist, they've handled the situation badly for the most part, but I see a fast moving difficult to handle and highly dangerous situation and you see a conspiracy.

wotsthat

Poshbird wrote: »

Yeah mate, trying to. There are so many lies though, how do you know what is the truth.

What research have you done by the way?

I did look at wikipedia and following some of the links. Some quite interesting stuff and I think I'll still sleep tonight. I'm not suggesting wikipedia is the zenith of scientific knowledge but it's a better starting point than Youtube.

Remember the MMR rubbish a few years ago? The doctor's work that 'linked' autism to the MMR jab was pretty easy to access. It was obvious that the whole thing was a pile of s**t.

Unfortunately far too many went along with the conspiracy theory (research isn't needed) instead of taking 5 minutes to look into it in more depth which led to children's deaths and a general mass hysteria.

Poshbird

wotsthat wrote: »

Why don't you do some proper research on the subject instead of consulting youtube and a random stranger on an internet forum.

You could say that about any question asked on any forum. Defeats the object of a discussion on a forum really.

wotsthat

Poshbird wrote: »

You could say that about any question asked on any forum. Defeats the object of a discussion on a forum really.

You could, but I see a difference between 'should interest rates rise?' and 'what are the effects of Caesium-137?' - especially on a money saving website.