We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Is there a difference between parking and waiting?

124»

Comments

  • BruLuc
    BruLuc Posts: 25 Forumite
    Not quite, it's a couple of clicks down the street from your link. It's here:

    maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=10+Osborn+Street+London,+E1+6TD&sll=53.800651,-4.064941&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=10+Osborn+St,+London+E1+6TD,+United+Kingdom&layer=c&cbll=51.516565,-0.069972&panoid=-2qxAN-2OA9FDMiy1V5u2g&cbp=12,135.98,,0,9.67&ll=51.515019,-0.067806&spn=0,0.02635&z=16

    (sorry, can't post links yet - and posting the above seems to insert the odd rogue space into the text)

    It's to the right of the City Hotel. Can't move closer on street view unfortunately. I think the van I stopped behind was outside the hotel.
  • Hadeon
    Hadeon Posts: 367 Forumite
    The impression given on this thread is that the lease company paid the PCN before notifying the OP of its existence.

    Unfortunately, in the absence of any further clarification, I have to state that I'm no longer entirely convinced that this is indeed the case.

    I'm happy to be corrected on this issue.
  • Hadeon
    Hadeon Posts: 367 Forumite
    Coupon-mad wrote: »
    Do we feel you have scope for appeal - always! Just ask pepipoo for advice. You would be surprised - most cases win when appealed as far as PATAS and there's no harm in asking pepipoo for their view rather than just paying up.

    C-m, with the greatest respect, any late determining & revelation of 'flaws' with the PCN etc etc which 'may have been' grounds for appeal, would now, in the main, be irrelevant & purely academic.

    There is absolutely no 'scope' or legal provision for any form of appeal here by the OP, as primarily the PCN has already been paid by the liable party, ie the RK.

    Crucially, what still remains unclear, is whether(or not) the OP had a 'reasonable opportunity' to 'engage' with the leasing company and/or Council prior to that payment being made.
    This would determine what other options may now be available to him.
  • BruLuc
    BruLuc Posts: 25 Forumite
    Hadeon wrote: »
    There is absolutely no 'scope' or legal provision for any form of appeal here by the OP, as primarily the PCN has already been paid by the liable party, ie the RK.

    Crucially, what still remains unclear, is whether(or not) the OP had a 'reasonable opportunity' to 'engage' with the leasing company and/or Council prior to that payment being made.
    This would determine what other options may now be available to him.
    Thanks, and I now realise that I cannot appeal against the PCN.

    Although I've been informed that the fine's been paid by the lease company, and have been requested to pay accordingly, I believe there is the opportunity to dispute it if there were grounds for appeal. Before I test this, I want to be confirm if there would have been grounds to appeal.
  • Hadeon
    Hadeon Posts: 367 Forumite
    Hadeon wrote: »
    BruLuc - it would help if you clarified the timeline of events, viz what exactly did you receive & when in relation to the date of the contravention itself.
    Also what exactly do the T&C's in your agreement with the lease company state with regard to parking contraventions & the like.
    Hadeon wrote: »
    The impression given on this thread is that the lease company paid the PCN before notifying the OP of its existence.

    Unfortunately, in the absence of any further clarification, I have to state that I'm no longer entirely convinced that this is indeed the case.

    I'm happy to be corrected on this issue.
    Hadeon wrote: »
    Crucially, what still remains unclear, is whether(or not) the OP had a 'reasonable opportunity' to 'engage' with the leasing company and/or Council prior to that payment being made.
    This would determine what other options may now be available to him.

    ??????????
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.