We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

TV on wall

191011121315»

Comments

  • clutton wrote: »
    i am interested in who is looking after OP's child in the many many hours she has spent here arguing

    There have been some cheap shots at the OP. So far, this is probably the cheapest.
  • clutton_2
    clutton_2 Posts: 11,149 Forumite
    this thread is her only thread and her only contributions to MSE - look for yourself....
  • paul1964 wrote: »
    There have been some cheap shots at the OP. So far, this is probably the cheapest.

    It might have been cheap but it was hilarious.
  • Nixxx
    Nixxx Posts: 368 Forumite
    paul1964 wrote: »
    This is where I disagree with you. If the LL wishes to define what is "unreasonable", or wishes to be the sole arbitrator of what is reasonable, this should be written into the contract. As he has chosen not to, it would be for a court to decide what is "unreasonable". The OP has indeed agreed to the Ts&Cs in the contract, as has the landlord - they both should abide by them equally.

    Hence why I stated that the landlord should have explained why he felt it was reasonable to decline the request. Then on that basis the judgement of reasonability can be gauged.
    paul1964 wrote: »
    From the insulting nature of many of the posts, I disagree that they were written by reasonable people.

    Although many have thrown insults (which I do not agree with by the way) most have indeed disagreed with the OP.
    paul1964 wrote: »
    I totally disagree with this - but it may be a typo.

    I agree, this was incorrect, I should have said, the OP does not "own" this house but should ofcourse regard it as their home.

    paul1964 wrote: »
    I also think the OP should not waste much energy on this, but I think he/she should be allowed to chew the fat on a subject without being abused. I really don't see why some people are getting so troubled by such a minor matter that they lose the ability to behave in a civil manner.

    I agree with you here. However, it does seem that considering the OP doesn't even want to live in this property for the long term then this is more hassle than its worth.
    "Dance like nobody's watching; love like you've never been hurt. Sing like nobody's listening; live like its heaven on earth." - Mark Twain
  • ruggedtoast
    ruggedtoast Posts: 9,819 Forumite
    Good grief. Some poor !!!!!! wants to put a bracket on a wall and has promised his landlord that he'll make it good, is refused, and this goes to 8 pages.

    I really despair of this country. I think someone needs to explain to some landlords that they arent actually real lords...
  • Gee, I dunno maybe the plaster on the walls is friable and the whole lot will need to come down and redone. Maybe the OP is planning to fix this thing somewhere that might cause a rupture to a water-pipe or electrical cables underneath. Apart from willfully going against the landlord's wishes, and they have every right withhold permission, the OP could be risking a whole heap of misery.

    Something in the corner of my heart is telling me that this could be well-deserved.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.