We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Have a crash now and then lets build a real economy.
Comments
-
Mr._Pricklepants wrote: »Hamish posted a thread a few days ago (now pulled, surprise surprise...) which proved beyond doubt that devon was behind the re-wired thanking sockie.
Yes, it was around the time when I posted a separate thread which proved beyond doubt that you are behind the MrRee account and all the Gh0uls accounts. Shame that was pulled at the same time.0 -
chewmylegoff wrote: »Yes, it was around the time when I posted a separate thread which proved beyond doubt that you are behind the MrRee account and all the Gh0uls accounts. Shame that was pulled at the same time.
You're conversing with Renoman here. I don't need proof. Just look at the style of writing. The same pet names. The same slip ups. Even the same entire sentences sometimes (as if he's trying to highlight the point). There was one from prickly the other day describing how someone would pay off 2% of their mortgage each year....following on from the 4% renoman blunder that lasted for several pages.
The sentance was exactly the same, even down to punctuation, just the 4 changed to 2, as if to be willing people to claim he's renoman. it's wasn't even really on topic, just placed into a thread revolving around house prices.
It's so obvious it's all attention seeking, I don't bother giving the attention. So now were back to fabricating lies, and describing these things as beyond doubt, absolutely true etc etc....so long as the evidence is gone. Who used to do that?
Doesn't take 2 guesses!
I'd imagine lots of people logged off at the same time that Saturday. There was forum maintanance that night, and I managed to post at 9.36pm in the motoring forum, yet my profile stated I hadn't been logged on. I did ask this question, but the excitement over the "outing" buried this little issue within seconds!
More than happy to be rewired though, as I keep saying. STILL winding the usuals up...day after day
I'm also wookster, mewbie, shortchanged & Jimmy.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »I'm also wookster, mewbie, shortchanged & Jimmy.
It was worse for me when someone told me that I was sockie, up until then I had assumed that I was a normal person with a whole life to live, but it all came crashing down when I found out that I didn't really exist. My wife was devestated too when she suddenly found out that she had married a fictional charactor similar to one that would be at home in a Philip K !!!!!! novel.Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »You're conversing with Renoman here. I don't need proof. Just look at the style of writing. The same pet names. The same slip ups. Even the same entire sentences sometimes (as if he's trying to highlight the point). There was one from prickly the other day describing how someone would pay off 2% of their mortgage each year....following on from the 4% renoman blunder that lasted for several pages.
Hmm - normally your sockie spotting skills are quite good but I think you're wrong on this one.
As I said yesterday (I forget which account I used) it might be possible that there's more than one person who thinks you talk rubbish. However, it might be the case that there's only one person with that POV and they have such a massive vendetta against you that they've created a sockie army to disagree with your arguments.0 -
Hmm - normally your sockie spotting skills are quite good but I think you're wrong on this one..
I only ever claim it when I'm positive, so I guess that's why the track record in your opinion is pretty good.
I'm pretty positive on this one, though could be wrong, even the expected insults are increasinly looking as if they could be cut and pasted from a certain late poster. The nicknames, the fabrications...funnily enough this poster too, get's more vocal the more you ignore it. Until....like last time, the need for attention goes so far, they get shown the door.
Maybe they are simply copying? That would be even more tragic0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »There was one from prickly the other day describing how someone would pay off 2% of their mortgage each year....following on from the 4% renoman blunder that lasted for several pages.
I don't think that was Prickle.This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
-
It was "Eellogofusciouhipoppokunu"This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
-
Graham_Devon wrote: »You may be right. May have been that DP character. They both morph into one for me.
I'm still waiting for you to substantiate your statement that I have knowledge of deleted posts.
Or did you just make that up?"Beware of little expenses. A small leak will sink a great ship." - Benjamin Franklin0 -
I'm still waiting for you to substantiate your statement that I have knowledge of deleted posts.
Or did you just make that up?
This post from the deleted thread that proves you are MrRee proves it. Unfortunately it has been deleted now, so I can't link to it, but I memorised it for evidential purposes:DpchMd wrote:I know all about the deleted posts that Graham is referring to
There were several more deleted posts which prove other things which I can reproduce on demand if anyone is interested. (I may require a small fee to jog my memory though, Paypal accepted).0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards