We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Have a crash now and then lets build a real economy.
Comments
-
chucknorris wrote: »Was there some event that happened which caused Foxy to quit? I can't see the point in dumping one username just to take up another.
I dunno, I assume he felt the need to adjust his story and make a more credible character.
We all know how that worked out."Beware of little expenses. A small leak will sink a great ship." - Benjamin Franklin0 -
I dunno, I assume he felt the need to adjust his story and make a more credible character.
We all know how that worked out.
But it was so obviously him returning!Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
I swear on my life I have never had another name (other than 1 which had a couple of posts on the insurance board which I forgot about).
I'm pretty sure I only started posting on this site after I checked your post history and felt compelled to ridicule you.
You're welcome about the whatever you said.
Will let HER dig a hole for a little while longer;) not that I am in the least bit bothered what she calls herself, it's the contents of her posts that should be the main thing on this board, to date two hundred of your three hundred posts are about me(flattered) the rest are about GD, just a teenzy weenzy bit disturbing though, and now that you have started PMing me as well.
You still have not made an apology about calling me rewired half a dozen times before you started accusing GD of the same thing:)0 -
homelessskilledworker wrote: »Will let HER dig a hole for a little while longer;) not that I am in the least bit bothered what she calls herself, it's the contents of her posts that should be the main thing on this board, to date two hundred of your three hundred posts are about me(flattered) the rest are about GD, just a teenzy weenzy bit disturbing though, and now that you have started PMing me as well.
You still have not made an apology about calling me rewired half a dozen times before you started accusing GD of the same thing:)
Sorry for calling you rewired, I know now it's Graham.
Did you actually count my posts or are you just wildly exaggerating? Seems like you get quite a lot wrong.
What did my PM say again?"Beware of little expenses. A small leak will sink a great ship." - Benjamin Franklin0 -
I swear on my life I have never had another name (other than 1 which had a couple of posts on the insurance board which I forgot about).
I'm pretty sure I only started posting on this site after I checked your post history and felt compelled to ridicule you.
You're welcome about the whatever you said.
Oh right, yer. You decided to read loads of historical posts (from select authors) before deciding to comment.
This reading of old posts, before commenting, allowed you to pick up all the knowledge, including that of deleted (and therefore, you couldn't read them) posts.
Aye. Of course. Silly me.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »Oh right, yer. You decided to read loads of historical posts (from select authors) before deciding to comment.
This reading of old posts, before commenting, allowed you to pick up all the knowledge, including that of deleted (and therefore, you couldn't read them) posts.
Aye. Of course. Silly me.
Do me a favour and give me an example, cos I'm actually telling the truth.
One example where I have been able to talk about something I should have no knowledge of..."Beware of little expenses. A small leak will sink a great ship." - Benjamin Franklin0 -
What about all the threads you are dragging up?
Someone was banned in a spat with the fox. I'm just putting 2 and 2 together. Might be making 5, but theres lots of 2 and 2's to be putting together. Firstly you're appearance saw one poster with loads of "gool" names just give up when you arrived. Secondly, you came here with seemingly lots of knowledge and lots of "targets".
Nothing would be said normally, but you are the one dragging history up, for some reason only known to you.0 -
oh look out, inspector devon is at it again, accusing someone of being someone else. what do ya reckon graham, 4th or 5th time lucky this time? i'm sure you'll get it right one day. :T
having said that, i'm not sure the user in question has exactly covered themselves in glory - definitely seems to be spoiling for a fight here. fair enough to call it as you see it, but not sure there's any need to be dredging up these old threads other than picking a fight....'Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.'
GALATIANS 6: 7 (KJV)0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »What about all the threads you are dragging up?
Someone was banned in a spat with the fox. I'm just putting 2 and 2 together. Might be making 5, but theres lots of 2 and 2's to be putting together. Firstly you're appearance saw one poster with loads of "gool" names just give up when you arrived. Secondly, you came here with seemingly lots of knowledge and lots of "targets".
Nothing would be said normally, but you are the one dragging history up, for some reason only known to you.
I'm afraid you've come to the wrong conclusion.
Someone posted the other day that the_fox, iandury and some other account were all homelessskilledworker. I used the search feature to look up the posts and found them highly amusing.
He's a very vocal character on this forum and it's important that visitors realise that his posts are pure fantasy.
No idea about the gool stuff G-dog."Beware of little expenses. A small leak will sink a great ship." - Benjamin Franklin0 -
RUN_RABBIT_RUN wrote: »oh look out, inspector devon is at it again, accusing someone of being someone else. what do ya reckon graham, 4th or 5th time lucky this time? i'm sure you'll get it right one day. :T
having said that, i'm not sure the user in question has exactly covered themselves in glory - definitely seems to be spoiling for a fight here. fair enough to call it as you see it, but not sure there's any need to be dredging up these old threads other than picking a fight....
^^I am RUN_RABBIT_RUN"Beware of little expenses. A small leak will sink a great ship." - Benjamin Franklin0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards