Cylists without lights - disproportionately annoys me!!

Azari

bosseyed wrote: »

Harry, by your utterly !!!!!! and bizarrely twisted logic, anyone not in a tax paying vehicle whilst upon the tarmac isn't actually paying to use the road - so I assume you think pedestrians also haven't paid to use the road? So following your own logic, naturally you never cross roads on foot at any stage as you haven't paid to use them?

Seriously, do you have any idea how ridiculous your arguments are and how utterly, utterly mental you sound?

I think HF is really nothing more than a troll.

I know that you do get some petrol heads who are completely clueless about the realities of taxation and road provision but I suspect that he's just after attention.

Harry_Flashman

As you say

You know nothing of me and have no reason to believe this. However, I am expressing my honestly held opinion. It obviously clashes with your opinion, but that makes it no less valid than yours (or yours than mine). We're probably much too far apart to ever agree.

It is a shame when posters feel the need to stoop to abusive terms though - shows a lack of intelligence.

Azari

Harry_Flashman wrote: »

As you say

Glad you admit it.

You know nothing of me and have no reason to believe this.

Neither of these assertions are true.

It's perfectly clear from your postings that you are a very extreme and immature person.

However, I am expressing my honestly held opinion. It obviously clashes with your opinion, but that makes it no less valid than yours (or yours than mine). We're probably much too far apart to ever agree.

If you had the sense of the average 12 year old you would realise that statements such as 'cyclists have no moral right to use the roads' are indicative of someone who is either deliberately trying to wind people up or is so stupid that he seriously believes that successive governments would allow a relatively small minority to behave in an immoral manner when that minority has no great electoral clout. 'Moral' here, of course, being used in the sense of societal norms, not personal ones.

It is a shame when posters feel the need to stoop to abusive terms though - shows a lack of intelligence.

Normally that would be true but it gets to a point where a poster's views are so extreme and downright silly that pointing this out is actually the sensible option as it alerts others to the pointlessness of trying to have an intelligent discussion.