We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Benefits shake-up: warning for non-working claimants

2456722

Comments

  • KxMx
    KxMx Posts: 11,270 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    How about the Government creating jobs, that will cut the JSA bill and raise revenue. But no, they're sacking thousands of civil servants and are not allowed to stop EU immigration!
    AnxiousMum wrote: »
    Good job that there will be three strikes before you're out then.

    Yes but those 3 strikes involve loss of all money for a period of time with no right of appeal and few hardship funds.
  • I believe that this should read "Addressing the concerns of disabled people".
    If you really want to be politically correct it should be "Addressing the concerns of people with disabilties". Your statement suggests that the person is disabled rather than they have a disabilty :D
  • nzseries1
    nzseries1 Posts: 2,240 Forumite
    MSE_Guy wrote: »
    "Tough welfare rules will strip the unemployed of handouts for up to three years if they refuse to work..."


    Hooray!! :D:D:D
    You're spelling is effecting me so much. Im trying not to be phased by it but your all making me loose my mind on mass!! My head is loosing it's hair. I'm going to take myself off the electoral role like I should of done ages ago and move to the Caribean. I already brought my plane ticket, all be it a refundable 1.
  • wrightk
    wrightk Posts: 975 Forumite
    how about creating more jobs for the entry level unskilled worker making it pay to work rather than stripping people of benefits forcing them to find work that just isnt out there (in most cases)

    I say this as a full time worker 40+ hours a week,
    I know how hard it is to find work and even find a better paid job than im in now, ive been searching for 2 years!
    Even a stopped clock tells the right time twice a day, and for once I'm inclined to believe Withnail is right. We are indeed drifting into the arena of the unwell.
  • prosaver
    prosaver Posts: 7,026 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    KxMx wrote: »
    How about the Government creating jobs, that will cut the JSA bill and raise revenue. But no, they're sacking thousands of civil servants and are not allowed to stop EU immigration!



    Yes but those 3 strikes involve loss of all money for a period of time with no right of appeal and few hardship funds.
    Unemployment is an unbalance between the supply and the demand of working hours. We all know that the efficiency of all types of machines is increasing yearly. We need fewer people to produce the same goods. Work time has been reduced in the past 200 years from about 12 hours a day to less then 8 hours per day and the working week from 7 days to 5. The way to stop Unemployment and have everybody working, is to continue the historical trend; is to distribute the available work between all persons that want to work. This we can do if each person works fewer hours per week
    tell your mp to get his finger out
    “Life isn't about finding yourself. Life is about creating yourself.”
    ― George Bernard Shaw
  • KxMx
    KxMx Posts: 11,270 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 11 November 2010 at 12:19PM
    You make some good points there. But although I expect most machinery is made abroad, once it gets here you still need workers to deliver it, install it, run it, maintain it, service it and clean it. So although there is less work, perhaps it isn't as low as you'd think.
  • liam8282
    liam8282 Posts: 2,864 Forumite
    prosaver wrote: »
    Unemployment is an unbalance between the supply and the demand of working hours. We all know that the efficiency of all types of machines is increasing yearly. We need fewer people to produce the same goods. Work time has been reduced in the past 200 years from about 12 hours a day to less then 8 hours per day and the working week from 7 days to 5. The way to stop Unemployment and have everybody working, is to continue the historical trend; is to distribute the available work between all persons that want to work. This we can do if each person works fewer hours per week
    tell your mp to get his finger out

    Let's have a 3 day weekend (but get paid the same of course!). :rotfl::T
  • corbyboy
    corbyboy Posts: 1,169 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture
    Does anybody know how the enforced work placement is going to be compatible with the mimimum wage regulations?
  • if there is a job there for somone on the dole to do for there money, then there should be a "paying" job doing it full time so the person is not on the dole anyway
  • prosaver
    prosaver Posts: 7,026 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    liam8282 wrote: »
    Let's have a 3 day weekend (but get paid the same of course!). :rotfl::T
    maybe it will happen :j
    :rotfl: :beer: :rotfl:
    “Life isn't about finding yourself. Life is about creating yourself.”
    ― George Bernard Shaw
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.