We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
BBC: Scottish Property Prices Reach All Time High
Comments
-
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »He seems to fancy anyone who provides statistical and factual information that shows his information to be incorrect.
It seems this "geneers gals" thing is a way to dilute the thread in the vain attempt that others may not come to see the facts as they are.
He even called the graph I produced containing the facts as spam
:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:Ah the gals are getting all in a tizz.
I guess they missed me.
Come on babe. Never said I had any problem with the ROS numbers.
Its the interpretation and relevance of the same in relation to me which you're getting all hot and bothered about. But then the path to true love never runs smooth.
The graphs not spam. Its you posting it again, and again, and again, in the hope that it will somehow develop new relevance which is chucklesome.
0 -
I guess they missed me.
You can't let it lie can you?
We had 4 days of peace between the 4th and the 8th and another three days of bliss between the 10th and 13th.
I'm already looking forward to your next period of absence :wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
Never said I had any problem with the ROS numbers.
Good, were all happy thenThe graphs not spam. Its you posting it again, and again, and again, in the hope that it will somehow develop new relevance which is chucklesome.
What this one?
Facts are what they are and it's there for people to understand the relevance:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »You can't let it lie can you?
We had 4 days of peace between the 4th and the 8th and another three days of bliss between the 10th and 13th.
I'm already looking forward to your next period of absence
Yet here you are knocking at my door again. :rotfl:
No certainly appears to mean yes for you doll.
0 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »Good, were all happy then
I don't know IveSeenTheLite. You appear to be a bit of a grumpy bunny.IveSeenTheLight wrote: »What this one?
The one where edinburgh house prices are tanking in line with leading indicators like ESPC.
Yep. Thats the one.IveSeenTheLight wrote: »Facts are what they are and it's there for people to understand the relevance
If not yourself eh. :A0 -
Yet here you are knocking at my door again. :rotfl:
No certainly appears to mean yes for you doll.
It's demonstrably clear who can't keep away from this thread the most.
Seems like your doing the most knocking, but then again, you don;t like facts to get in the way do you
I don't know IveSeenTheLite. You appear to be a bit of a grumpy bunny.
I'm extremely happy, not sure where you think I'm grumpy.
Looking forward to the weekend when I get to see the 4d scan of baby no 2.
You couldn't know me off a cloud ever and especially not this weekend
The one where edinburgh house prices are tanking in line with leading indicators like ESPC.
Yep. Thats the one.
If not yourself eh. :A
Seeing as were on a new page, here's the graph again for clarity
All related facts can be found here
http://www.ros.gov.uk/professional/eservices/land_property_data/lpd_stats.html
Next time I'll put on a trend line for you:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »It's demonstrably clear who can't keep away from this thread the most.
Seems like your doing the most knocking, but then again, you don;t like facts to get in the way do you
Fact is, here you are again sweetheart.
Don't be jealous, just because I've had to deal with more than one of Geneers Gals.
I never made you any promises of exclusivity.IveSeenTheLight wrote: »I'm extremely happy, not sure where you think I'm grumpy.
Looking forward to the weekend when I get to see the 4d scan of baby no 2.
Yes yes. You're married, you have a wife, and kids. On account of having intercourse with your wife. Not men. You have no interest in men. We know this because you're compelled to keep saying so. :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:IveSeenTheLight wrote: »You couldn't know me off a cloud ever and especially not this weekend
I don't know IveSeenTheLite.
Your strange obsession with this Edinburgh based forum member isn't all that suggestive of a happy, healthy personality.
But hey, maybe you have deeper problems.
Does your cross-eyed, arbitrary foaming obsession in "proving" that a relatively new member of this forum might have bought at one point in the past rather than a few weeks later help keep your mind of those men you absolutely have no interest in.IveSeenTheLight wrote: »Seeing as were on a new page, here's the graph again for clarity
All related facts can be found here
http://www.ros.gov.uk/professional/eservices/land_property_data/lpd_stats.html
Next time I'll put on a trend line for you
Hey thanks Lite. The same graph you've posted a dozen times before. :T
Can't help but notice that the current trend is down. 0 -
Just one kid at the moment, Master ISTL.Yes yes. You're married, you have a wife, and kids.
Fantastic news received yesterday that he'll be joined by a Miss ISTL.
Life is great isn't it?
Not bothered at all.Does your cross-eyed, arbitrary foaming obsession in "proving" that a relatively new member of this forum might have bought at one point in the past rather than a few weeks later help keep your mind of those men you absolutely have no interest in.
Simply posting facts for all to see.
You on the other hand seem determined seem determined to bend the facts to show a different outcome.
Good joke about the few weeks though :rotfl:Hey thanks Lite. The same graph you've posted a dozen times before. :T
Can't help but notice that the current trend is down.
One day you'll understand the methodology and that individual monthly figures are noisey.
Just for you, I've added the trend line showing the longer term trend
:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »Not bothered at all.
Simply posting facts for all to see.
Yes. Simply posting again and again the fact that you have no interest in men. This has been noted. :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:IveSeenTheLight wrote: »You on the other hand seem determined seem determined to bend the facts to show a different outcome.
Yet the evidence show's you're the one with a steely determination to prove.....erm...what exactly? :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:IveSeenTheLight wrote: »Good joke about the few weeks though :rotfl:
Given the facts, its clearly not a joke.
Is it babe?IveSeenTheLight wrote: »One day you'll understand the methodology and that individual monthly figures are noisey.
yawn.IveSeenTheLight wrote: »Just for you, I've added the trend line showing the longer term trend
Why didn't you add the trend line from 1602.
That will prove your case. :laugh:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards