We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

BBC: Scottish Property Prices Reach All Time High

1…2223252728…38

Comments

  • IveSeenTheLight
    IveSeenTheLight Posts: 13,322 Forumite
    geneer wrote: »
    Fancy running a graph with these numbers Lite? :)

    I already did.
    Here you go again?
    Next time I'll even put in a trend line for you ;)

    55491449.jpg
    :wall:
    What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
    Some men you just can't reach.
    :wall:
  • IveSeenTheLight
    IveSeenTheLight Posts: 13,322 Forumite
    geneer wrote: »
    Fancy running a graph with these numbers Lite? :)

    Just noticed the latest figures have been released. Enjoy
    http://www.ros.gov.uk/pdfs/la_nov_10.pdf

    81502003.jpg
    :wall:
    What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
    Some men you just can't reach.
    :wall:
  • geneer
    geneer Posts: 4,220 Forumite
    chucky wrote: »
    try again....

    S'alright chucky.
    I can tell you're not bothered.
    I mean, you keep telling us so. :T
  • geneer
    geneer Posts: 4,220 Forumite
    edited 10 January 2011 at 2:45PM
    IveSeenTheLight wrote: »
    I already did.
    Here you go again?
    Next time I'll even put in a trend line for you ;)

    Really? Because your ESPC numbers look suspicously like the ROS numbers.
    (Whoops, someone was too busy blowing kisses to pay attention)
    IveSeenTheLight wrote: »
    Just noticed the latest figures have been released. Enjoy
    http://www.ros.gov.uk/pdfs/la_nov_10.pdf

    81502003.jpg

    :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:Oh no. A five percent monthly fall in Edinburgh.
    Gutted!
  • geneer
    geneer Posts: 4,220 Forumite
    IveSeenTheLight wrote: »
    Ah, a step forward.
    Well done.
    Realisation your wrong will help you to come to peace on so many levels

    Though you don't mention that my minor (and now corrected) mistake doesn't in fact make you right. :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

    IveSeenTheLight wrote: »
    There you go again, fantasizing about my @rse.

    Not at all sweetness. Its your mini-skirts and matching "Geneers Gals" T-shirts that I appreciate.
    IveSeenTheLight wrote: »
    I didn't make up the timeframe.
    How many months is it from Dec 05 to Jun 06?

    Not. Nine. :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
    IveSeenTheLight wrote: »
    Credibility is there to be seen by all.

    Thats what I keep saying. ;)
    IveSeenTheLight wrote: »
    Just look at the facts geneer.
    Once you take off the geneer tainted specs you wear, you;ll see the truth we all see.

    I'm not sure you your fluttering heart could handle it babe.
    You know how much more attractive people become once they take their specs off.
  • IveSeenTheLight
    IveSeenTheLight Posts: 13,322 Forumite
    geneer wrote: »
    Really? Because your ESPC numbers look suspicously like the ROS numbers.
    (Whoops, someone was too busy blowing kisses to pay attention)

    I'm sure even you can understand that the ROSEA stats are more encompassing than the ESPC figures.

    Still, you flit between indices if the figures make you feel better.
    I prefer to have continuity in my analysis instead of comparing apples with pears.
    geneer wrote: »
    :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:Oh no. A five percent monthly fall in Edinburgh.
    Gutted!
    Once again you are showing your missunderstanding of the methodology.
    Nevermind, if it makes you happy ;)
    :wall:
    What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
    Some men you just can't reach.
    :wall:
  • IveSeenTheLight
    IveSeenTheLight Posts: 13,322 Forumite
    geneer wrote: »

    Not. Nine. :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

    Where did I say that?
    You making things up again.

    It was so peaceful in this thread between 4th and the 8th.
    You just couldn't keep away could you.
    :wall:
    What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
    Some men you just can't reach.
    :wall:
  • Pimperne1
    Pimperne1 Posts: 2,177 Forumite
    IveSeenTheLight wrote: »
    Where did I say that?
    You making things up again.

    It was so peaceful in this thread between 4th and the 8th.
    You just couldn't keep away could you.

    I'm just glad he's taken a fancy to you now. It lets me off the hook. ;)
  • IveSeenTheLight
    IveSeenTheLight Posts: 13,322 Forumite
    Pimperne1 wrote: »
    I'm just glad he's taken a fancy to you now. It lets me off the hook. ;)

    He seems to fancy anyone who provides statistical and factual information that shows his information to be incorrect.

    It seems this "geneers gals" thing is a way to dilute the thread in the vain attempt that others may not come to see the facts as they are.

    He even called the graph I produced containing the facts as spam :rotfl:
    :wall:
    What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
    Some men you just can't reach.
    :wall:
  • geneer
    geneer Posts: 4,220 Forumite
    IveSeenTheLight wrote: »
    I'm sure even you can understand that the ROSEA stats are more encompassing than the ESPC figures.

    Still, you flit between indices if the figures make you feel better.
    I prefer to have continuity in my analysis instead of comparing apples with pears.

    In other words, I was right. ;)

    IveSeenTheLight wrote: »
    Once again you are showing your missunderstanding of the methodology.
    Nevermind, if it makes you happy ;)

    :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:5% fall.
    Pretty understandable if you ask me.
This discussion has been closed.
★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.
Update Your Picture