Lowell/Red Collection

FuzzyCub

Whilst usually I can accept mistakes happen and I don't waste emotional energy over "bad judgemen calls", I believe that the MSE team should answer the question: Why have DCAs have been given an apparent legitimate and endorsed voice in a forum like this? The membership of this site deserve an answer.

reallylost

shameless bump
please answer the question

WRINKLES

reallylost wrote: »

shameless bump
please answer the question

The members of this forum are the forum without them there is no forum , once again would the management please answer , why have LOWELL s been allowed to post on this forum .

mrtk1

There are a few forums similar to this 1 were Lowells have been allowed to make postings & as a result,have angered alot of forum posters in the process.
Cant help but think that there is more to all of this than what meets the eye :cool:

WRINKLES

mrtk1 wrote: »

There are a few forums similar to this 1 were Lowells have been allowed to make postings & as a result,have angered alot of forum posters in the process.
Cant help but think that there is more to all of this than what meets the eye :cool:

You have read my mind .

WRINKLES

What makes me suspect something iffy is going on is , it is always LOWELL s , out of all the mickey mouse outfits around , none of them get posting priveleges only LOWELL , would someone care to tell me why .

mrtk1

The really cynical side of me would go so far as to say thats its all part of a conspiracy involving Lowells themselves or the wider debt collection industry as a whole.
At the end of the day - forums like this are a threat to the debt industry profits.
Too many people are finding out their rights on forums like this that the debt industry would rather you didnt know.
So its only natural that they are gonna want to counteract that threat in whatever way they can :cool:

WRINKLES

mrtk1 wrote: »

The really cynical side of me would go so far as to say thats its all part of a conspiracy involving Lowells themselves or the wider debt collection industry as a whole.
At the end of the day - forums like this are a threat to the debt industry profits.
Too many people are finding out their rights on forums like this that the debt industry would rather you didnt know.
So its only natural that they are gonna want to counteract that threat in whatever way they can :cool:

Are we thinking the unthinkable ? CONSUMER ACTION GROUP , did a u turm , they sold out their members for the sake of profits .

WRINKLES

WRINKLES wrote: »

Are we thinking the unthinkable ? CONSUMER ACTION GROUP , did a u turm , they sold out their members for the sake of profits .

If the question is not answered , MSE members can only make up their own minds , This would trully be a sad day fot MSE .

timbstoke

DVardysShadow wrote: »

Why? Well, I think anyone, just anyone should have the right of reply. Perhaps they might hang themselves.
bevhicks, do take them up on this and post progress here.

I agree that anyone has a right of reply. I would have no issue whatsoever with a DCA opening an account, and making posts on the forum under a registered username. I'd even encourage accounts used to post on behalf of companies having a special 'company representative' status to make their posts more noticable.

But that should be done in the open under a registered account, not by proxy as a result of crying to the moderators.