Death doesn't bring an end to timeshare fee

terryw

fluffnutter wrote: »

I agree. Personally I can't believe that people haven't challenged this (and won) before. But then it is just some old article from the Mail so no doubt it's just a bit of chuntering nonsense.

A difficult one to answer fluff. The Mail may not be everyone's source of news and many people like to disregard anything in there.

But Tony Hetherington is very well respected and has been a genuine people's champion for many a long year. To disregard this article is not a wise decision just because it was in the Mail.

Just out of interest, have you (or indeed anyone) come across anything at all where people have challenged this and won?

fadetogrey

just wondering,if you "sold" it to A N other and had his "signature" on the paperwork and A N other was to emigrate leaving no forwarding address then you are in the clear and its up to the timeshare company to take it up with him when they find him?;)

Azari

fadetogrey wrote: »

just wondering,if you "sold" it to A N other and had his "signature" on the paperwork and A N other was to emigrate leaving no forwarding address then you are in the clear and its up to the timeshare company to take it up with him when they find him?;)

I suspect not.

If you have a liability you cannot simply sell it. If you sell something with an attached liability (e.g. you sell a house with some repayments remaining on a load for improvements) the liability remains with you. Otherwise, all sorts of debts could be reneged upon.

tbw

Azari wrote: »

I suspect not.

If you have a liability you cannot simply sell it. If you sell something with an attached liability (e.g. you sell a house with some repayments remaining on a load for improvements) the liability remains with you. Otherwise, all sorts of debts could be reneged upon.

But if your yearly maintenance payments are up to date then surely you are not selling it on with an attached debt? My paperwork (a bit sparse on detail) does say on the certificate that its very easy to sell and just involves signatures on the certificate etc with no fiddly other paperwork.

fluffnutter

terryw wrote: »

A difficult one to answer fluff. The Mail may not be everyone's source of news and many people like to disregard anything in there.

But Tony Hetherington is very well respected and has been a genuine people's champion for many a long year. To disregard this article is not a wise decision just because it was in the Mail.

Just out of interest, have you (or indeed anyone) come across anything at all where people have challenged this and won?

No, I've not heard of any successes in challenging this. But that's probably because I simply don't know of anyone who's bought or inherited a timeshare! I suspect they're less common than they used to be... too many horror stories.

Azari

tbw wrote: »

But if your yearly maintenance payments are up to date then surely you are not selling it on with an attached debt?

It's not a debt, it's a liability.

I really don't know the answer. It's something that needs a solicitor. It may well depend on whether the people who originally sold the timeshare ever suspected it would become worthless. If they didn't, then their remedy for non-payment of the fees may be limited to repossession of the property.

fluffnutter

Azari wrote: »

It's not a debt, it's a liability.

I really don't know the answer. It's something that needs a solicitor. It may well depend on whether the people who originally sold the timeshare ever suspected it would become worthless. If they didn't, then their remedy for non-payment of the fees may be limited to repossession of the property.

Indeed. If you've inherited a timeshare that you don't want and don't use, then simply not paying may well result solely in repossession. In which case, who cares?

Errata

I don't think fresh air can be repossessed, which is what a timeshare is. Does what it says on the tin

Azari

fluffnutter wrote: »

Indeed. If you've inherited a timeshare that you don't want and don't use, then simply not paying may well result solely in repossession. In which case, who cares?

That is, however, only one possibility. Others may be less benign.

You cannot simply rely on that being the case.

Consult a solicitor.

zzzLazyDaisy

Selling a timeshare isn't always as easy as they make out. It isn't the timeshare itself that is the problem, it is the underlying lease which the original TS owner remains liable for if the subsequent owner/s default. I am at the moment trying to transfer a jointly owned TS into the sole name of my ex (by agreement). I am having to complete a complicated form, take it with my passport to a notary public and have the whole thing witnessed presumably to prove I am actually the joint owner and the ex isn't trying to steal it from me. The cost to me is going to be something in the region of £100/150 and then there are further fees to the ex when he registers the deed with the TS owners. TBH it is worth it to me to get rid of the liability since it has always been 'his' in practice and I have never used it. But the point is, it really isn't as simple as finding a stranger to take over the liability and then disappear.

(Although it has occurred to me that someone on the verge of going bankrupt could buy it and then take the whole thing down in the bankruptcy, but I bet there are holes in that idea too!)