We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Traffic Law? Information needed please

123457»

Comments

  • Stigy
    Stigy Posts: 1,581 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    if there was any truth in a single copper in a panda car on an A road not being able to stop a vehicle then what would be the point of a panda car? most of britains roads are A roads, if this was true then they wouldnt have panda cars and just use the persuit vehicles instead for responses it would save them and use allot of money wouldnt it! commonsense should of prevailed to you that wasnt true!
    I agree.

    Even some Roads Policing officers patrol single crewed, which, given the very nature of their work would deem them useless!
  • gingerdad wrote: »
    Plus if he was in his works van, he would be breaking the speed limit at 60....

    this is an A road not motorway and car derrived vans and vans upto a certain size are not restricted. some company's restrict their vans to 50 MPH as a matter of company policy and insurance purposes.
  • Stigy
    Stigy Posts: 1,581 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    this is an A road not motorway and car derrived vans and vans upto a certain size are not restricted. some company's restrict their vans to 50 MPH as a matter of company policy and insurance purposes.
    Vehicle speed restriction variations still apply on roads with a national speed limt other than motorways.
  • Gavin83
    Gavin83 Posts: 8,757 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    mikey72 wrote: »
    Well, if a policeman catches some thug burgling my home, I hope they don't need to have an independent witness before they send him down.

    It is an interesting situation.

    Effectively what we're saying is, if a policeman has a personal hatred of someone (for whatever reason) they could get them arrested for the crime based on their word alone.

    Im fairly sure for more serious crimes further evidence would be needed. I'd be extremely worried if they could send someone to prison for several years based on just the say so of one person.

    Frankly them being in the police force means nothing to me. It's just a job, anyone can do it with the correct training and they are subject to the same emotions as any other human. Say the OP dad was a vicar? Or a soldier? Should his statement then be given more weight?

    Anyone can make a mistake, including the police and Im sure they are unlikely to admit they are wrong once the finger has been pointed.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.