MSE News: Banks put PPI claims on hold in defiance of regulator

Mr_CMC

petecorfu wrote: »

Good to have you here fellow cmc!!

its only £1 for the ppi dsar by the way!! lol! or is that a nice little hook for your clients?

Hello Pete,

Sorry but there is no such thing as a "ppi dsar"

There is a Sec 77/78 request, which is a simple copy of the credit agreement which will outline if the client has ppi or not added to the loan, this is charged at £1.00 giving the lender 14 days to respond plus they get another couple of weeks if they default.


We request a SAR (section 7 of the 98 DPA btw) which costs £10.00 and includes the full file on the client, all agreements, statements, and copies of contact between the client and lender. The lender has 40 days to comply with this request.

You really should know this mate.

Mr CMC

Mr_CMC

Guys, it's late, I shall indeed give you my views on what the heck is going on with this BBA action at some point in the morning.

I come in peace, and will give you as much information as I can.

As other CMC's have already mentioned on this thread, we do communicate with both the FOS and the BBA.

Night all.

Mr CMC

Alpine_Star

Mr_CMC wrote: »

A sharp tongue is no indication of a keen mind.

The subject matter of this thread is as described at the beginning of the very first post:

''This is the discussion thread for the following MSE News Story:
Read the updated stories:

Banks join Lloyds in freezing PPI claims

and

Santander takes consumer side in PPI battle''

http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=37422412&postcount=1

Is that clear enough for you?

I'm afraid that your initial post comes across as nothing more than a self indulgent puff to promote the virtues of your business.

audley16

petecorfu wrote: »

Good to have you here fellow cmc!!

its only £1 for the ppi dsar by the way!! lol! or is that a nice little hook for your clients?

I have nothing against CMC's but I don't think you do much for their credibility.

Mr_CMC

Alpine_Star wrote: »

The subject matter of this thread is as described at the beginning of the very first post:

''This is the discussion thread for the following MSE News Story:
Read the updated stories:

Banks join Lloyds in freezing PPI claims

and

Santander takes consumer side in PPI battle''


Is that clear enough for you?

I'm afraid that your initial post comes across as nothing more than a self indulgent puff to promote the virtues of your business.

To be quite frank, Alpine, having read this thread through, I am wondering why you don't just lay your cards on the table and tell us who you represent?

Only a fool would believe you are on the consumer side, you "try" to play a smart game by getting those sly digs in, and coming across very obviously as a bank side snide, and then when pulled, you quickly retreat and copy&paste some info that gets the troops on the consumer side back on side.

Quite laughable, but very obvious.

I stated my background, so that in time to come, people would not question my motives/background.

I very much doubt this is something you could grasp, considering the angle you come from.

I am sorry you find yourself as such an ANGRY person in your life right now, but in time you will get better, if you allow it, that's the key.

Cheers

Mr CMC

Alpine_Star

Mr_CMC wrote: »

To be quite frank, Alpine, having read this thread through, I am wondering why you don't just lay your cards on the table and tell us who you represent?

I don't represent anyone and you are completely wrong - I am very pro consumer.

So now we've got that straight are you going to give us the information/views on the JR that you promised or not?

Mr_CMC

Alpine_Star wrote: »

I don't represent anyone and you are completely wrong - I am very pro consumer.

So now we've got that straight are you going to give us the information/views on the JR that you promised or not?

I'm sure you are, and I'm sure you would not wish to compromise your position by telling the truth, ironic in all that sounds.

Why are you so angry?

All you seem to do his spew out hate and anger on this thread, get it sorted or you will ruin yourself.

When I wish to write about my views on the JR, I shall.

Mr CMC

petecorfu

Mr_CMC wrote: »

Hello Pete,

Sorry but there is no such thing as a "ppi dsar"

There is a Sec 77/78 request, which is a simple copy of the credit agreement which will outline if the client has ppi or not added to the loan, this is charged at £1.00 giving the lender 14 days to respond plus they get another couple of weeks if they default.


We request a SAR (section 7 of the 98 DPA btw) which costs £10.00 and includes the full file on the client, all agreements, statements, and copies of contact between the client and lender. The lender has 40 days to comply with this request.

You really should know this mate.

Mr CMC

im useing my own slang! i call them ppi dsar's

petecorfu

Mr_CMC wrote: »

I'm sure you are, and I'm sure you would not wish to compromise your position by telling the truth, ironic in all that sounds.

Why are you so angry?

All you seem to do his spew out hate and anger on this thread, get it sorted or you will ruin yourself.

When I wish to write about my views on the JR, I shall.

Your bang on there about alpine mr cmc!!! you have had the same feeling i had + thebigdog + debt55 and you have just joined!!

Funny that alpine a?

audley16

Mr_CMC wrote: »

I'm sure you are, and I'm sure you would not wish to compromise your position by telling the truth, ironic in all that sounds.

Why are you so angry?

All you seem to do his spew out hate and anger on this thread, get it sorted or you will ruin yourself.

When I wish to write about my views on the JR, I shall.

Where does he come across as angry? I don't see it, sorry.

You actually said you would reveal your views on the JR this morning. That has passed and we are all waiting.