MSE News: Banks put PPI claims on hold in defiance of regulator

pompeyfaith

I contacted Natwest PPI claims unit (or whatever they are called) and they told me that the JR had finished on 28th. February. I asked them the status of my claim and they said that they hadn't been given any guidelines on how to proceed with claims. I was told to ring back in 2 weeks. I rang back in 3 and got told exactly the same. I have read that they lost the JR and that they have to contact customers and pay back what they owe at a cost of some £3.2 billion. Is my next step to contact the FOS now as I have surely shown enough patients over 4 months with this matter. I want my money back as I am paying interest on it and it affects me each month financially.
Any idea's on how to proceed please as I think they are fobbing us off with the same excuse.

Can you tell me where you got that info from as it is wrong no Judgement has been handed down and is still being decided upon by Mr Justice Ouseley.

The case has been heard but Judgement is and was reserved.

di3004

Yes I'm sure we would have heard something by now otherwise.;)

PPI_Technichal_Expert

pompeyfaith wrote: »

Can you tell me where you got that info from as it is wrong no Judgement has been handed down and is still being decided upon by Mr Justice Ouseley.

The case has been heard but Judgement is and was reserved.

pompeyfaith is correct no decision has been made. Dont get your hopes up yet this wont be resolved for a very long time. Whichever party loses will appeal.

Did anybody notice who was representing the BBA? One of the best firs in the world....will be an interesting one!

the_knitting_drummer

A little off-topic SPAMblogg, don't you think? Are those 95% been put on hold in defiance of regulator? You could at least try to assimilate to the current climate and thread topic.

di3004

Mine 2 are still ongoing with lloyds, am awaiting a letter, and it will more than likely be like the one as posted in the link in above post.

Thanks for posting.

kirklean

What would be good would be a general reply letter that can be used highlighting the fact:
1) They lost the judicial review
2) That due to this there is no reason for the hold
3) FSA or FOS have not permitted any further unreasonable delay
4) Regardless of an appeal/no appeal that the complaints ought to be dealt with in the normal manner.

I am working on one for myself just now as I received this letter last week. I am anxious to know the outcome of the BBAs decision to the appeal.