We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Halifax Hpi September 2010 -3.6%

1141517192066

Comments

  • benb76
    benb76 Posts: 357 Forumite
    blueboy43 wrote: »
    no idea, but the Halifax spreadsheet has tabs for both non and seasonally adjusted national prices.

    My view would be when comparing annual increase or decrease, it would be best to use the non seasonal adjusted price in both cases.

    Sorry, my post was more of a rhetorical question in response to people speculating on the seasonal adjustment of the annual figures. Annual percentage rise or falls cannot, by definition, be seasonally adjusted!
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    blueboy43 wrote: »
    no idea, but the Halifax spreadsheet has tabs for both non and seasonally adjusted national prices.

    My view would be when comparing annual increase or decrease, it would be best to use the non seasonal adjusted price in both cases.
    non-seasonal adjusted tells you a bit more... there is a difference in them but that's because of the size in the fall.

    seasonal adjusted is -3.6% and non-seasonal adjusted is -3.1%
  • mbga9pgf wrote: »
    So Hamish, how have you benefitted from today?

    I live in Aberdeen.
    Average prices have fallen over 6 grand.

    Not in Aberdeen.
    feeling the pain there sat with multiple home ownership?

    Nope. Aberdeen prices already crossed previous peak this year.

    And I'm around £50,000 ahead on my latest purchase versus not buying and renting for the same time frame. And that amount is increasing every month.

    So if we have another crash like the last one, I'll be 100K ahead by the end of it.

    It's why I don't get worked up about it any more....

    Time is the enemy of crashaholics.

    A short sharp crash would have meant it might have paid off for them... But a long drawn out affair means it's virtually impossible for them to benefit.
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • angrypirate
    angrypirate Posts: 1,151 Forumite
    Really2 wrote: »
    The figures are in real terms, so perhaps they have taken it on nominal for sept-sept. So nominally they are up but in real terms they have fallen?

    Might be wrong but only thing I could think of.
    The annual isnt done by taking Sept 2009 and Sept 2010. Its done by first calculating the 3month on 3 month average over the course of the 12 months, and then this is used to calculate the annual change. Another way of fudging the figures - I believe they started doing this around 2007
  • This schart is looking more and more like becoming what will happen to the UKs house prices.

    The US and Ireland are a few years ahead of us, and is playing out just like the chart.
    Blacklight wrote: »



    Money-Week_clip_image001.jpg


    3.6% fall last month. Looks like we are now just after the bull trap. Next few months/years will reveal all.

    The start and up to where we are just after the bull trap are very similar to this scary chart.
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    It's NOT a fall. .


    Good grief.
  • angrypirate
    angrypirate Posts: 1,151 Forumite
    chucky wrote: »
    non-seasonal adjusted tells you a bit more... there is a difference in them but that's because of the size in the fall.

    seasonal adjusted is -3.6% and non-seasonal adjusted is -3.1%
    This would be down to the seasonal adjustment they put on the figures earlier this year - come the end of the year, the seasonal adjustment over the last 12 months needs to balance and im guessing they've done some serious massaging of the figures earlier in the year to keep them positive.
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 7 October 2010 at 11:07AM
    Looks to me like Halifax is a statistical blip
    no Hamish it's not a statistical blip. its the results of one months Halifax figures that you can't get away from.

    one thing they are is that they are distorted geographically.

    the North has house price falls while the South East doesn't.
    16 of the top 20 towns reporting the biggest increase in sales are in London and the South East. Most of these are towns with good commuter links to central London.
    The market has, in general, been slower in the north and nine of the ten towns recording the smallest rises in sales are outside London and the South East.
    http://www.lloydsbankinggroup.com/media/pdfs/halifax/2010/300910Sales_Hotspots.pdf
  • JonnyBravo
    JonnyBravo Posts: 4,103 Forumite
    Mortgage-free Glee!
    The annual isnt done by taking Sept 2009 and Sept 2010. Its done by first calculating the 3month on 3 month average over the course of the 12 months, and then this is used to calculate the annual change. Another way of fudging the figures - I believe they started doing this around 2007

    Or of helping to eliminate rogue months. In either direction.

    As for the drop..... need another couple of these to reach my -5% prediction for Nov 2010.
  • angrypirate
    angrypirate Posts: 1,151 Forumite
    JonnyBravo wrote: »
    Or of helping to eliminate rogue months. In either direction.

    As for the drop..... need another couple of these to reach my -5% prediction for Nov 2010.
    Rogue months?? As of the end of September, house prices are lower than they were 12 months ago.

    Ok, so house prices may not go down as much, or may even increase in October, showing that Sept was a little bit of an anomoly, but the fact remains that right now according to Halifax, house prices are lower than they were 12 months ago.

    Why do Halifax try to skew this and hide it?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.