We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
HPC tearing itself apart... Welcome Dr Bubb.
Comments
-
HOUSE_PRICE_CRASH_GHOULS wrote: »You pay for it one way or another. If Sibbers is happy to pay up front that's his private business.
I hate this often spouted cliche. "You pay for it one way or another, whether it's dinner or just directly paying an escort. Same thing, innit?"
No. They are two completely different things. One is two people forming a relationship and, incase you've been asleep for the past twenty years, most relationships nowadays (whether they be romantic or sexual, or a spot of both...) aren't really formed around this old-fashioned notion of blokes paying for anything with the sole aim of getting in to the woman's pants. On the occassions when I have bought things for women (dinner, present etc. etc.) it's normally because I'm enjoying spending time in their company, not solely because I want to bed them. And, I'm sure like most of the modern men on here, I've been bought dinner and presents by women.
The "you pay for it one way or another" line is normally trotted out by men who equate paying for sex as exactly the same as dating or forming normal relationships, when they're clearly completely different. It shows, in my opinion, a real bitterness towards women and an inbility or difficulty in forming normal relationships. I wouldn't judge Sibley for paying for sex with prostitutes, I guess I would just make the observation that it's a bit of a sad situation and doing it without questioning the morals and thinking that they all seem to love it, as indicated in his first post, is rather niave at best. Dumb at worst.0 -
Naive?
Do you think Sibley and HOUSE_PRICE_CRASH_GHOULS are here giving real views? I've got them both down as rather poor sockies.
Even if they happen to be "real", perhaps it is you who is naive, thinking you're going to get any meaningful type of response from these two muppets.
You should know better.0 -
JonnyBravo wrote: »Naive?
Do you think Sibley and HOUSE_PRICE_CRASH_GHOULS are here giving real views? I've got them both down as rather poor sockies.
Even if they happen to be "real", perhaps it is you who is naive, thinking you're going to get any meaningful type of response from these two muppets.
You should know better.
To be honest JB I can't be ars*d to get in to the debate of who is and isn't a sock puppet. I just look at comments on the screen and respond to the ones I want to respond to.0 -
This forum is being ruined by playground name calling
Q.E.D.
Oh and b.t.w. I challenge you to find a playground where children insult each other by saying 'you are an immature, poisonous individual.'
Oh this will be my last post, this place is malignant and not a nice forum to participate in.
Have fun trying to verbally destroying others, sadly the only thing you are destroying is your own integrity.
I hope you all learn to become better people.
Aw bless. Throwing your toys out of the pram again?
Your own ability to dole out puerile insults is pretty well established:
http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.html?p=37027662&postcount=46This is the last time I will respond to your childish b0ll0x again nollag2006, I will just say to others viewing this thread, and indeed any other thread that nollag2006 has posted in. He is totally wrong about who I am , and someone who jumps down a new posters throat and posts pathetic jpegs to back up his so-called findings is so full of excrement that any potentially viable post by them is tainted by there utterly-blinkered view. Nollag2006 your posts are so worthless they are worse than no post at all. Grow up and join the debate in a meaningful way you complete Phukwit.
Bye bye now.
:wave:
Always a real shame to see a bear running away
We will miss your sparkling wit and bonnie repartie.
My sense is though that another sockie will soon reappear.
Please don't run away so soon next time
:rotfl:0 -
To be honest JB I can't be ars*d to get in to the debate of who is and isn't a sock puppet. I just look at comments on the screen and respond to the ones I want to respond to.
Well now I'm the silly one. You've chosen to respond to Sibley, HOUSE_PRICE_CRASH_GHOULS and me. What illustrious company I keep.
:eek:0 -
JonnyBravo wrote: »Well now I'm the silly one. You've chosen to respond to Sibley, HOUSE_PRICE_CRASH_GHOULS and me. What illustrious company I keep.
I think if you chose to contribute to a forum, you've just got to respond to any comment you're interested in and not really worry too much about who's posted it. Doesn't matter if it's Generali or Nollag (who I tend to imagine are at opposing ends of the intellectual spectrum), you just have to take it at face value.0 -
neverdespairgirl wrote: »Nope. What I do do is a lot of work with trafficked women, "escorts" and brothels.
Thailand has serious problems with sex tourism, forced prostitution, rape, child prostitution, and trafficking.
And aids, I guess :eek: I read somewhere that the local male population use prostitutes quite a lot and have been infecting their wives, don't know how true that is.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
HOUSE_PRICE_CRASH_GHOULS wrote: »Thankfully most people aren't that paranoid or intellectually challenged to think that x poster must be a sockie because they hold a differing opinion.
However you are a sock puppet, you can't deny that. Your high hostility from the start with low post count give that away. Its not rocket science to spot you.
Posts: 30
Personally I think you have issues.
As for the HPC site I hope it calms down. It is clear morons are setting up sock puppets to taught the establish posters just as they have here. They have no argument and just result to childish games. I myself have had to put some of these fools on ignore.
Its clear that house prices are going to continue falling despite the stimulas despite the ocassional out of sequence data blip. The trend is down and the economic fundamentals point to a downward path as well.:exclamatiScams - Shared Equity, Shared Ownership, Newbuy, Firstbuy and Help to Buy.
Save our Savers
0 -
And aids, I guess :eek: I read somewhere that the local male population use prostitutes quite a lot and have been infecting their wives, don't know how true that is.
That was the major issue in Africa the last couple of decades. The males use to migrate to the cities for work and spend their money on prostitutes and beer. Prostitutes would spread HIV round the workers who would in turn go back home and spread it to their wives.:(:exclamatiScams - Shared Equity, Shared Ownership, Newbuy, Firstbuy and Help to Buy.
Save our Savers
0 -
Tbh we should look a little closer to home when we talk of forums pathetically banning people, on HPC for instance I believe DrBubb got banned for a period of time (12 months I think).
On one particular forum i care not to mention, someone got banned for having one obvious and tongue in cheek sockie and laughing and thanking another poster who loaded up a picture of his penis.
That ban I might add was permanent with no chance of parole.Have owned outright since Sept 2009, however I'm of the firm belief that high prices are a cancer on society, they have sucked money out of the economy, handing it to banks who've squandered it.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards