JJB gave grandsons ipod away.

gordikin

Nope...zaksmum, her son, and her grandson are too busy to reply.

Jeff_Bridges_hair

gordikin wrote: »

Nope...zaksmum, her son, and her grandson are too busy to reply.

Which one is in america? are they still there? Will this saga ever end..


tune in next week.

peachyprice

Doof, doof doof, doof.............

cyberbob

gordikin wrote: »

Nope...zaksmum, her son, and her grandson are too busy to reply.

No in reality they have probably decided it's pointless to have there reply ripped apart and have silly assumptions made by a bunch of Muppets.

The only people keeping this going are the afore said Muppets.

sookipeaspud

Pollycat wrote: »

Serious Organised Crime Agency?
Is this a 'serious' suggestion?

If the police are unwilling to get involved, I'm very doubtful that SOCA will be willing to.

One female opportunist thief is hardly 'organised' - and comparable to drugs or human trafficking or major gun crime.

I understand. However, under the current threat level, can we be sure that this offence does not carry terrorist implications?

It would be wise to report this due to implications of using anothers login to encrypt sensitive data. After all, according to some posters, Ipod is not a toy.

adouglasmhor

cyberbob wrote: »

No in reality they have probably decided it's pointless to have there reply ripped apart and have silly assumptions made by a bunch of Muppets.

The only people keeping this going are the afore said Muppets.

I see you are still posting; nuff said.

gordikin

cyberbob wrote: »

No in reality they have probably decided it's pointless to have there reply ripped apart and have silly assumptions made by a bunch of Muppets.

The only people keeping this going are the afore said Muppets.

...like you are..?

Freddie_Snowbits

Seconds Out, Round 1.

sookipeaspud

What is the current situation on this difficult scenario?
I think it maybe practicle for the OP to contact Public Relations JJB.

Thanks,

Enfieldian

sookipeaspud wrote: »

Once the Ipod connects to the internet, APPLE / Itunes will record the IP address of the user. Apple could provide the IP address of the device to the police who will be able to execute a warrant (if granted by the magistrates) to enter the property and seize the said Ipod.

The OP will have to provide details of the purchased Ipod and if not then the registration details of the Ipod in question. There MUST of been some sort of registration to sync the Ipod to a computer.

Once the police have a warrant they can smash down the door if necessary to get the Ipod.

I was told this by a friend at my local pub who has a retired uncle from the police.


Thanks,

That is hilarious.

How much had you both had to drink?