Why I never bother with travel insurance

Nobjocki

Pollycat wrote: »

WOW!
You can tell between 'desperation' and 'shrill' just by reading the words! :rotfl:
Aren't you the clever one?

What part of

are you having difficulty in understanding?
I personally don't feel the necessity to comment on my financial situation but as you obviously feel the need to keep mentioning your wealth, maybe you should seek help for your obvious insecurities.

I'm not unnerved by someone who doesn't choose to buy travel insurance.
Why would I be unnerved?

You choose not to buy because you can fund every single eventuality which might occur on your foreign travels.
Not everybody can - but you are still extolling the idea that buying travel insurance is a con.

Thanks for your concern, I have a holiday booked to Goa next month - and I have both travel insurance and buildings/contents insurance - because unlike you I don't rely on statistics. :cool:

And, as you are so fond of statisitcs, why not count the number of posters who agree with your viewpoint and the number who disagree?

Oh, there'll be Yoghurt....
and Yoghurt....

I can't hear you now above the noise of you stamping your feet.:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

pink_princess

Nobjocki wrote: »

I can't hear you now above the noise of you stamping your feet.:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

I think you chose an apt user name.

Yoghurt_3

Nom nom nom.. :wave:

Nobjocki

pink_princess wrote: »

I think you chose an apt user name.

That's what my wife says when she's in the saddle
But it's nice to see youve found something slightly more interesting to post about than what you're having to eat today.
Quite the dullard aren't you .

lynzpower

I would like to see some statistics please, which ones are we referring to?

Pollycat

Nobjocki wrote: »

I can't hear you now above the noise of you stamping your feet.:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

All out of reasoned discussion, then, Nobjocki?

Nobjocki

Pollycat wrote: »

All out of reasoned discussion, then, Nobjocki?

Not at all.
I've been quite reasonable about stating the reasons why I think travel insurance is a con.
You are the one who has become increasingly splenetic over that simple statement .

Pollycat

Nobjocki wrote: »

That's what my wife says when she's in the saddle
But it's nice to see youve found something slightly more interesting to post about than what you're having to eat today.
Quite the dullard aren't you .

Pink Princess
Ignore Nobjocki (I agree it's a very apt name), you can always tell when someone is losing in a debate - they go scurrying round checking up on posts that have no relelvance to the one under discussion.

Nobjocki

Pollycat wrote: »

Pink Princess
Ignore Nobjocki (I agree it's a very apt name), you can always tell when someone is losing in a debate - they go scurrying round checking up on posts that have no relelvance to the one under discussion.

Pollycat and Pink Princess.

Perfect names for a couple of drama queens.

Pollycat

Nobjocki wrote: »

Not at all.
I've been quite reasonable about stating the reasons why I think travel insurance is a con.
You are the one who has become increasingly splenetic over that simple statement .

Me and how many others, Nobjocki?

Or are you embarrassed to admit that there's not a lot of people standing on your side of the fence?