We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
TinyXP - What the ?
Comments
-
So, MS Office means Windows.
It might be worth Windows 7 64-bit for a bit(!) of future proofing...0 -
-
I guess TinyXP won't support a quad-core CPU.
Possible options are Windows 7 (maybe 64-bit), Linux, or Solaris.
If he's got kids in school or education he may be able to get Win 7 at a good price from softwareforstudents.
Windows has supported Symmetric Multiprocessing since 1996 with the release of NT4. Of all the problems TinyXP introduces, having a quad core processor isn't one of them.0 -
So, can you get Mac OS X running on that machine then?DatabaseError wrote: »
(I suppose i could have prefixed my statement with "in the context of this thread", but then again the statement was made within the context of this thread.)
The licence with XP Pro is for 1-2 CPUs - does it consider a CPU to be (a) a processor chip, regardless of the number of cores (ie. the quad-core is 1 CPU), or (b) each core a processor chip (ie. the quad-core CPU is 4 CPUs)?Windows has supported Symmetric Multiprocessing since 1996 with the release of NT4. Of all the problems TinyXP introduces, having a quad core processor isn't one of them.0 -
Aha - the answer is here: http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/about-licensing/multicore-processor-licensing.aspx
So a single multi-core processor counts as 1 CPU, as anewhope says.
(Which is good!)0 -
Almost certainly, though it would be unlicensed...a little like the current situationSo, can you get Mac OS X running on that machine then?
:AUtinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant.0 -
I know about the hackintosh, but as they say on the site: "You can't just shove a Mac OS X DVD into any old PC and expect it to work like it does on a Mac.".DatabaseError wrote: »
Suggesting that the OP sets up his friend's main machine as a hackintosh is really not going to work out well for anybody concerned, is it?
(P.S. I have Macs and looked into running a netbook as a hackintosh a while back, but not all of the components had drivers available - you may have rekindled my interest...)0 -
(or even Vista) Being a powerful machine it deserves a decent operating system anyway dont you think!

This made me chuckle
Let's face it, XP or 7, but Vista ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?......Gettin' There, Wherever There is......
I have a dodgy "i" key, so ignore spelling errors due to "i" issues, ...I blame Apple
0 -
Something is missing from this account somewhere methinks. TinyXP, Twin graphics cards (Crossfire?), Quad Core and all for "..just a bit of browsing and MS Office". This doesn't stack up unless one of the following applies: the OP has omitted (or hasn't been told) that the spec his friend gave his "computer man" was for a gaming machine and just a bit of browsing and MS Office; the machine was bought second-hand or, perhaps more likely, the computer man said something like "I've got a machine on the shelf I built for another guy but he couldn't/would't pay, didn't like it/changed his mind, but I'll let you have it cheap.
I really can't see anyone installing TinyXP on what would seem to be a higher end machine without there being a very specific reason for it. Having only ever installed it once it took me virtually a full day hunting around for drivers as most if not all of the driver cabs had been stripped out and whilst it seemed that there were many differing versions available I'd plumped for one that wasn't ideal. Its far easier just to install XP and be done with it.
This situation doesn't have the smack of a "computer man" tucking a customer up where one might expect to see an under-performing, under-spec'ed machine but something rather more towards the opposite end of the scale (allowing for the fact that we don't know how much RAM its running). In any event I suspect we have a machine here that, perhaps for one of the reasons advanced above, is not being used as it was intended when it was built.My very sincere apologies for those hoping to request off-board assistance but I am now so inundated with requests that in order to do justice to those "already in the system" I am no longer accepting PM's and am unlikely to do so for the foreseeable future (August 2016).
For those seeking more detailed advice and guidance regarding small claims cases arising from private parking issues I recommend that you visit the Private Parking forum on PePiPoo.com0 -
AFAIK Tiny XP usualy comes with all driverpacks available. Only time this would not work if it was a specific machine that had new hardware not available when the iso was made. I've even used it to get a laptop working - fully.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
