We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
10+% unemployment typical in England by 2015
Comments
-
Guessing just leads to misunderstanding and prejudice, why not just say what you mean?
He means The Daily Mail publish a lot of stories in which the editorial slant is strongly biased against certain groups, specifically ethnic minorities and homosexuals. I would also argue it is a paper that hates women- especially "career women" and single mothers (recent front page story in which Emma Thompson states that women can't have it all). Their reporting of health issues is woeful at best and downright dangerous at worst (literally EVERYTHING gives you cancer).
A couple of Richard Littlejohn colums should suffice as a starting point if this really is news to you.
Edit: a handy summary of the Mail's cancer prevention guide: http://www.thedailydust.co.uk/2009/02/19/20-strange-things-the-daily-mail-say-will-cause-cancer/They are an EYESORES!!!!0 -
Out,_Vile_Jelly wrote: »He means The Daily Mail publish a lot of stories in which the editorial slant is strongly biased against certain groups, specifically ethnic minorities and homosexuals. I would also argue it is a paper that hates women- especially "career women" and single mothers (recent front page story in which Emma Thompson states that women can't have it all). Their reporting of health issues is woeful at best and downright dangerous at worst (literally EVERYTHING gives you cancer).
A couple of Richard Littlejohn colums should suffice as a starting point if this really is news to you.
Edit: a handy summary of the Mail's cancer prevention guide: http://www.thedailydust.co.uk/2009/02/19/20-strange-things-the-daily-mail-say-will-cause-cancer/
He apparantly has never read it.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards