We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Barclays have left me cashless

13567

Comments

  • disgustedvictim
    disgustedvictim Posts: 19 Forumite
    edited 18 August 2010 at 2:17PM
    zppp wrote: »
    Well they and all financial institutions have a legal obligation to submit anything that looks or is suspicious behaviour, and that applies to financial instituions and approved individuals.

    This link will provide you ith the consent process that gives the timescales; SOCA Online Information.

    No my sister got sent money as well. Natwest didn't bother her. They didn't even say anything when she paid her rent. So it appears either that natwest is lazy or Barclays is extremely overzealous.

    Seeing that I haven't done anything wrong. I'm going with the latter.
    Needless to say. I don't like being treated like a criminal. I don't care if some idiot out there is smuggling drug money for the Colombian !!!!!. Going after criminals doesn't give anybody the right to go after innocent people.

    I've work at heathrow airport as a security guard. We were always on a constant watch for terrorists. Yet we never treated innocent people like this.

    oh and that link didn't work.

    And the bank obviously know your clean criminal record don't they ^_-
    They can phone the police. It has happened to me several times. I get stopped and searched. The officer phones calls on his radio to check my record. Nothing comes up. They apologies and let me go on with my business.
  • daniel598
    daniel598 Posts: 63 Forumite
    So basically I'm being treated like a criminal. Well it looks like as soon has this saga is over. I won't be banking with Barclays. This is the straw that has broken the camels back for me.

    You need to look at this from barclays side as well. £700 turning up out of the blue from overseas. I know it frustrating but no matter who you bank with this would have been the case. If banks fail to report it they face fines prosecution and the staff that have failed to spot it or cleared it without reporting could be given a jail sentence. So unfortunately patience is the key.
  • WhiteHorse
    WhiteHorse Posts: 2,492 Forumite
    edited 18 August 2010 at 2:18PM
    It would appear that the overseas connection is the reason that your account has been suspended. Some countries do attract more attention than others, and rightly so. What country are we talking about?

    That said, an overseas connection is not in itself sufficient reason to suspend an account. If it was, half the accounts in Britain would be suspended at any one time. The chances are that it's some jobsworth trying to make a name for themselves.

    Barclays have lied to you. Whether that was deliberate or it's just jobsworths trying to bullsh*t you, is another matter.

    You have several grounds for complaint. If they take much longer to reach a negative conclusion, you can claim compensation. They have no right to freeze your money (you have not the use of it, so it is effectively taken), without good grounds, nor to hang on to it indefinately.
    "Never underestimate the mindless force of a government bureaucracy
    seeking to expand its power, dominion and budget"
    Jay Stanley, American Civil Liberties Union.
  • daniel598 wrote: »
    You need to look at this from barclays side as well. £700 turning up out of the blue from overseas. I know it frustrating but no matter who you bank with this would have been the case. If banks fail to report it they face fines prosecution and the staff that have failed to spot it or cleared it without reporting could be given a jail sentence. So unfortunately patience is the key.


    I got sent £1600 on the same account by the same people in june to pay off my college course. They didn't care then. Why do they care all of the sudden?
  • Lokolo
    Lokolo Posts: 20,861 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    They can phone the police. It has happened to me several times. I get stopped and searched. The officer phones calls on his radio to check my record. Nothing comes up. They apologies and let me go on with my business.

    So a bank can just phone the local police station and ask for a criminal record check on a person can they?

    Wow. Just. Wow.
  • zppp
    zppp Posts: 2,476 Forumite
    No my sister got sent money as well. Natwest didn't bother her. They didn't even say anything when she paid her rent. So it appears either that natwest is lazy or Barclays is extremely overzealous.

    Seeing that I haven't done anything wrong. I'm going with the latter.
    Needless to say. I don't like being treated like a criminal. I don't care if some idiot out there is smuggling drug money for the Colombian !!!!!. Going after criminals doesn't give anybody the right to go after innocent people.

    I've work at heathrow airport as a security guard. We were always on a constant watch for terrorists. Yet we never treated innocent people like this.

    oh and that link didn't work.


    They can phone the police. It has happened to me several times. I get stopped and searched. The officer phones calls on his radio to check my record. Nothing comes up. They apologies and let me go on with my business.

    Sorry, the link doesn't work I think it has a session ID. Here is the information that is relevant;

    Consent / deadlines

    Consent
    The legislation requires institutions or individuals to ask for permission to carry out a prohibited act if a suspicion has been raised prior to the activity, that there is a suggestion of criminal property in whole or in part attached to the business. The legislation also stipulates the type of permission required which is either 'nominated officer' consent, whereby SOCA will issue consent to the nominated officer only; or 'appropriate consent' where a nominated officer, SOCA, a constable or a customs officer, may issue consent to carry out the prohibited act. To assist the reporters in obtaining a decision from the UKFIU in respect of the activity undertaken on behalf of your client/customer, the Proceeds of Crime Act imposes time limits for giving or withholding consent. NB: Activity does not have to be the physical movement of money or 'transactions'. The activity you are undertaking must fall within s327-329, which can involve concealing, converting, facilitating, arranging, acquiring etc. Deadlines
    There are 7 working days from the day after the report was made in which to give or withhold consent and on the 8th day consent is assumed. If consent is withheld, law enforcement has a further 31 calendar days in which to obtain a restraint order and on the 32nd day consent is assumed. The 31 days starts as soon as consent is withheld during the initial moratorium period eg: the total timescale may be 3 + 31 days or 7 + 31 days.
    Best Regards

    zppp :)

  • Lokolo
    Lokolo Posts: 20,861 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    I got sent £1600 on the same account by the same people in june to pay off my college course. They didn't care then. Why do they care all of the sudden?

    A person spends money on someone elses card. The transaction goes through. Woop. The person then does it again as they feel as though they can get away with it.

    A pattern emerges and the bank caps onto this and investigates possible fruad.

    It's simple when you think about it.
  • WhiteHorse wrote: »
    It would appear that the overseas connection is the reason that your account has been suspended.
    Some countries do however attract more attention than others, and rightly so. What country are we talking about?

    That said, an overseas connection is not in itself sufficient reason to suspend an account. If it was, half the accounts in Britain would be suspended at any one time. The chances are that it's some jobsworth trying to make a name for themselves.

    Barclays have lied to you. Whether that was deliberate or it's just jobsworths trying to bullsh*t you, is another matter.

    You have several grounds for complaint. If they take much longer to reach a negative conclusion, you can claim compensation. They have no right to freeze your money (you have not the use of it, so it is effectively taken), without good grounds, nor to hang on to it indefinately.


    Who do I complain to? The fraud office? Or the number that guy gave me earlier? I want this sorted out asap. I'm not willing to spend the rest of my summer holidays waiting for them to call me to tell me everything is all fine and dandy and make some stupid excuse that doesn't make up for the time i wasted. I'm leaving London soon so I don't want to spend the rest of my time in the city cooped up in my house.
  • daniel598
    daniel598 Posts: 63 Forumite
    Maybe barclays feel this is the second irregular payment from overseas and needs looked at.
  • zppp
    zppp Posts: 2,476 Forumite
    WhiteHorse wrote: »
    It would appear that the overseas connection is the reason that your account has been suspended. Some countries do attract more attention than others, and rightly so. What country are we talking about?

    That said, an overseas connection is not in itself sufficient reason to suspend an account. If it was, half the accounts in Britain would be suspended at any one time. The chances are that it's some jobsworth trying to make a name for themselves.

    Barclays have lied to you. Whether that was deliberate or it's just jobsworths trying to bullsh*t you, is another matter.

    You have several grounds for complaint. If they take much longer to reach a negative conclusion, you can claim compensation. They have no right to freeze your money (you have not the use of it, so it is effectively taken), without good grounds, nor to hang on to it indefinately.

    Wrong on several counts.

    1. SOCA can take funds under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 indefinitely.
    2. There are no grounds for compensation as the bank hasn't made an error, they have simply reported a transaction.
    3. They are legally obligated to freeze funds until the Financial Intelligence Unit have investigated. The timescales are aforementioned.
    Best Regards

    zppp :)

This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.