no MOT car is write off, 1st central not paying

raskazz

dont_be_stupid wrote: »

yeah ok. we will see if they will pay out. they will. you can get on with it. I have a life

So which other username were you posting as before?

Quentin

dont_be_stupid wrote: »

yeah ok. we will see if they will pay out. they will. you can get on with it. I have a life

This has been an excellent contribution to this discussion!

(But why have you wasted your time (and ours) like this?)

dont_be_stupid

I waste your time with my opinion, but you dont waste others time with yours? WOW your really arrogant

raskazz

dont_be_stupid wrote: »

I waste your time with my opinion, but you dont waste others time with yours? WOW your really arrogant

Opinion is one thing, but this is not an appropriate thread for guesswork, assumption and urban myth about technical motor insurance issues. The OP asked for assistance and he/she has been without their car for over 2 weeks now, unsure as to whether any claim will be paid. I think everyone would agree that what the OP requires is accurate, informed advice and information rather than unsubstantiated opionion masquerading as fact.

newbie007_2

Quentin wrote: »

For the sake of George..... (trolls shouldn't really be fed!)

There is no onus on the policyholder at all to prove this. It is up to the insurer to prove this if they want to decline the claim.

lol....I was meant to be quoting 'dont be stupid' but forgot to quote. This is not my opinion at all lol. 'Don be stupid' is sassy one in disguise?

dont_be_stupid

I don't need to justify myself to any of you.
Was looking for reviews.
someone one here was saying as they're registered abroad they don't follow the rules. That's crap. They trade in the UK they have to. Enough said.
Despite what you think I am entitled to my opinion as this is a forum for opinions. NOT a forum for legal advice.

newbie007_2

dont_be_stupid wrote: »

Despite what you think I am entitled to my opinion as this is a forum for opinions. NOT a forum for legal advice.

I think it was what you thought as facts before it became opinions. This thread is not for opinions so you can waste peoples time.
Too tired to argue, now re-energised with a new stupid username

Ian_W

So after 10 pages let me see if I've understood the situation ...

I'm driving down the motorway, not speeding as it's pouring with rain. My MOT has one week before it expires and being an avid MSEer my tyres, which I know need changing before the test, are using up the last few fractions of a millimetre of tread (no point in spending cash before you need to!).

Suddenly the motorway comes to a halt, as they do, and the guy in front is able to stop comfortably on his new tyres but though I'm not speeding or travelling particularly close I can't on my bald as a badger's @rse ones and rear end him. It turns out his MOT inadvertently expired the week before though his car is perfectly road legal.

So he's not insured and it follows it must be his fault ... makes perfect sense to me.

What's the contact details for this 1st central outfit? :rotfl::rotfl:

dacouch

Ian_W wrote: »

So after 10 pages let me see if I've understood the situation ...

I'm driving down the motorway, not speeding as it's pouring with rain. My MOT has one week before it expires and being an avid MSEer my tyres, which I know need changing before the test, are using up the last few fractions of a millimetre of tread (no point in spending cash before you need to!).

Suddenly the motorway comes to a halt, as they do, and the guy in front is able to stop comfortably on his new tyres but though I'm not speeding or travelling particularly close I can't on my bald as a badger's @rse ones and rear end him. It turns out his MOT inadvertently expired the week before though his car is perfectly road legal.

So he's not insured and it follows it must be his fault ... makes perfect sense to me.

What's the contact details for this 1st central outfit? :rotfl::rotfl:

You would be at fault in that type of accident so the car in front would claim off you whether or not he was insured or not

Ian_W

dacouch wrote: »

You would be at fault in that type of accident so the car in front would claim off you whether or not he was insured or not

Nooooooooooooo! Surely not? He's uninsured!

P.S. Did you miss the original ?