We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Advice please

Options
2»

Comments

  • Hammyman
    Hammyman Posts: 9,913 Forumite
    flippin36 wrote: »
    Thank you for your reply. Wasn't wanting sympathy at all. In fact the reason I'm asking is partly to do with family problems and other complicated matters. I'm not defending her any way shape or form - in fact quite the opposite. :(

    Kind of figured out that was the case. Its going to be expensive. She may also find out that Social Services will be taking an interest in her with her child being injured.

    She can claim and they'll pay out however the increase in insurance from making the claim will pale into insignificance compared to the increase from the offence she's convicted of. It won't be using a mobile whilst driving - its gone way beyond that as you suspect.
  • flippin36
    flippin36 Posts: 1,980 Forumite
    Thanks Hammyman, thats just what I was wanting to know. I'm a little ignorant about such things. Thank you.
  • Paradigm
    Paradigm Posts: 3,656 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    As Quentin has said it's impossible to guess the outcome until the charge is known.

    It's already gone beyond a fixed penalty & the fact someone was injured isn't going to help.
    Always try to be at least half the person your dog thinks you are!
  • daveyjp
    daveyjp Posts: 13,535 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Some people have to learn the hard way that phones and driving don't mix.

    Look up sentences for careless driving and dangerous driving - Points, possible ban and a hefty fine and insurance problems for many years.

    I'd personally give it the same punishment as drink driving, the current 3 points and a fine is a joke deterrent.
  • flippin36
    flippin36 Posts: 1,980 Forumite
    Thank you Paradigm and Daveyjp. I appreciate that.

    The thing that was eating away at me is that another relative (who can see no wrong in her) is advising her that she will just have to go on a drivers course and all will be forgiven, since she admitted the fault. Which (despite my ignorance) seemed ridiculous to me, considering the injuries to child and the level of damage. If I'm honest, I want them to throw the book at her both legally and financially as a lesson in responsibilities!

    Thanks again for your input, I think I have a clearer picture of what the outcome might possibly be.
  • Strider590
    Strider590 Posts: 11,874 Forumite
    She may get something like a 6 month ban, purely because of the injuries to the child and the extensive damage to the car. She could well have the social services on her back too, but that's no worry as long as she keeps a good home and they can see she's otherwise a responsible parent.....
    “I may not agree with you, but I will defend to the death your right to make an a** of yourself.”

    <><><><><><><><><<><><><><><><><><><><><><> Don't forget to like and subscribe \/ \/ \/
  • KillerWatt
    KillerWatt Posts: 1,655 Forumite
    tbourner wrote: »
    Probably dangerous driving. I think that can have a suspended sentence applied and a driving ban. She may have to retake her test. Not sure on levels of fine but expect hundreds.
    Dangerous driving is quite hard to prove, but if she talks her way in to a guilty on that when she is in court then it's an automatic 12 month ban and an extended retest.
    Remember kids, it's the volts that jolt and the mills that kill.
  • Yorkie1
    Yorkie1 Posts: 12,018 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    There are three possibilities:

    1. Police offer a Driver Improvement course, which means no court hearing & no penalties, other than the charge of going on the course
    2. Driving without due care and attention charge
    3. Driving dangerously

    I doubt she will be able to influence which option the police go for.

    Without knowing more about the facts of the accident, it's hard to say whether the police would assess her driving as careless or dangerous. The former requires her standard of driving to be below that of a careful and competent driver; the latter requires it to be far below.

    Being distracted by a mobile phone is relevant to both offences. The fact of injury or damage is not relevant to this, as the test for both offences is an objective one about the standard of driving and not the consequences. I guess that it might only be relevant to whether the police offer option 1 or not.

    The CPS has issued guidance about charge selection:
    http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/p_to_r/road_traffic_offences_guidance_on_prosecuting_cases_of_bad_driving/

    This also sets out the maximum penalties available to the court.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.