If you are thinking of buying this summer ....

new_home_owner_3

brit1234 wrote: »

They have, for the last couple of months. I haven't changed my mind, whats your point?

:think:

your problems isnt about changing your mind, its making your mind up, its like me saying liverpool will win the premier league in my signature.

example Liverpool will win the league 2010 -2090

you keep on saying house prices will drop youve said it in your signature in 2007 it would have happened by now, but now you have been expanding the dates.:D

why dont you change your signature to house prices will fall sometime in the next century?????:T

new_home_owner_3

chucky wrote: »

a contradiction...

but wait for it... 50% off peak 2007 prices by Christmas 2009... pmsl

she truly has become clown of the forum, with the way she changes her signature, only carolt comes a close second.:T

brit1234

new_home_owner wrote: »

she truly has become clown of the forum, with the way she changes her signature, only carolt comes a close second.:T

Sorry Hamish, Nollag, chucky, new home owner but I am a dude.

As for my original prediction didn't think they would cut interest rates to 0.5% to bail out the reckless. However I have said this a thousand times now and it is getting a bit borring. If you only way to fight your argument is to bring up a 2007 signature then you are truely on weak grounds.

chucky

brit1234 wrote: »

Sorry Hamish, Nollag, chucky, new home owner but I am a dude.

you're not the brightest are you... - i'm me thank you...

brit1234 wrote: »

As for my original prediction didn't think they would cut interest rates to 0.5% to bail out the reckless. However I have said this a thousand times now and it is getting a bit borring. If you only way to fight your argument is to bring up a 2007 signature then you are truely on weak grounds.

if anything is on weak ground it's you're signature... remind me again whats happened to house prices since Feb 2009. i'll telkl you, they've gone up

so remind me again... you're saying that "Prices are going to start to fall from here on in" but your signature says they're going to stagnate. make your mind up because you discredit yourself with nearly every post

PROPERTY BOTTOM - History tells us that property stagnates for years at the bottom, there will be no rapid rises at the bottom, don't rush.:think:

brit1234

chucky wrote: »

you're not the brightest are you... - i'm me thank you...
if anything is on weak ground it's you're signature... remind me again whats happened to house prices since Feb 2009. i'll telkl you, they've gone up

so remind me again... you're saying that "Prices are going to start to fall from here on in" but your signature says they're going to stagnate. make your mind up because you discredit yourself with nearly every post

Learn how to read and maybe you won't look so foolish.

History tells us that property stagnates for years at the bottom, there will be no rapid rises at the bottom, don't rush.:think:

You can not put together a reasonable argument so you go for name calling. You have no argument, you probably know whats coming.

nembot

Shouldn't be so tough on them Brit, not their fault they bought close to or at peak.

:beer:

Henry_P_Chester

HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »

I didn't say prices fell 6 months in a row.

HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »

Acadametrics, which you are referring to, also showed prices falling for 6 consecutive months in 2005.

I rest my case....

HAMISH_MCTAVISH

I didn't say prices fell 6 months in a row.

I said Acadametrics showed prices falling 6 months in a row at the time.

Do you understand the difference?

Published: September 9 2005 09:34 | Last updated: September 9 2005 09:34

House prices in England and Wales fell for the sixth month in a row in August, according to the FT house price index, the most reliable guide to the prices achieved by sellers in the property market, published on Friday.

Acadametrics, the consultancy that compiles the FT price index, said house price inflation “is likely to fall further still” because rises in prices last Autumn will gradually fall out of the calculation in the remainder of this year.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/b767ee50-2...00e2511c8.html

chucky

brit1234 wrote: »

Learn how to read and maybe you won't look so foolish.


You can not put together a reasonable argument so you go for name calling. You have no argument, you probably know whats coming.

hold on let me get this right - you reckon "History tells us that property stagnates for years at the bottom, there will be no rapid rises at the bottom"

i'm teliing you for a fact it doesn't but facts aren't important here are they...

but let's try anyway...

mid 1970s falls were never negative YoY because of high inflation - so no stagnation for years
1980s price falls were back to peak in about 16 months - so no stagnation for years
1990s - price fell for about 16 months, then stagnated for about 3 years before reaching peak 5 years later.
2008 price falls were reversed in Feb 2009 and rose between 10%-15% to now - so no stagnation for years

so remind me which "History tells us that property stagnates for years at the bottom, there will be no rapid rises at the bottom". Is this the history books according to Brit or reality because you certainly don't live in the real world if you think that was the case...

Henry_P_Chester

HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »

I didn't say prices fell 6 months in a row.

I said Acadametrics showed prices falling 6 months in a row at the time.

Do you understand the difference?

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/b767ee50-2...00e2511c8.html

why can't you just accept your wrong. It's clear for everyone to see, your just making a fool of yourself by arguing about the wording.