School declined holidays and branded the kids truants

sunshinetours

poet123 wrote: »

No, it isn't bullying, he is simply being asked to back up an assertion he made in a very rude and provocative manner. He then posted a link which did not in any way back his point, at which time his posting style descended even further downhill.

I never use the ignore button, if you wish to do so that is your prerogative.

My final point and I'll leave alone

Definition of bullying here in first paragraph. personally I think some should consider there own postings and replies. It is a choice to keep replying to these types of post, noone forces you

http://www.bullyonline.org/workbully/bully.htm

Some are not asking him to back up assertions they are simply replying to insults with other insults

poet123

sunshinetours wrote: »

My final point and I'll leave alone

Definition of bullying here in first paragraph. personally I think some should consider there own postings and replies. It is a choice to keep replying to these types of post, noone forces you

http://www.bullyonline.org/workbully/bully.htm

Some are not asking him to back up assertions they are simply replying to insults with other insults

That is a definition of workplace bullying. Below is another definition

blustery: noisily domineering; tending to browbeat others

AUK, is equally guilty of that, so no one is actually served well by bringing the term into play. It is an example of a not particularly pleasant or productive slide to a thread, but it is tit for tat, not bullying.

blue_monkey_2

He called me a pig - is name calling not bullying?? If you ignore it does it make the bullies go away? No, I tend to stand up to people like that.

Murphy_The_Cat

sunshinetours wrote: »

Some are not asking him to back up assertions they are simply replying to insults with other insults

But then I stopped doing it, as it wasn't much sport

As for reporting abusive posts, its one area where, IMO, MSE isn't to hot on following up on - never mind though, hopefully good decorum will once again descend upon our little corner of MSE;)

Mellowyellow_2

sunshinetours wrote: »

Some are not asking him to back up assertions they are simply replying to insults with other insults

Oh I wasn't insulting him, I was being funny.

photome

AnthonyUK wrote: »

I'm 39 actually so go to hell

You cant be 39, no reasonable adult would behave like you do, a child under 10 might tho so maybe you just added the 3 on

AnthonyUK

photome wrote: »

You cant be 39, no reasonable adult would behave like you do, a child under 10 might tho so maybe you just added the 3 on

And you don't pick on me and make fun of me like the rest of them did:I hate YOUUUUUU!!!!!! I didn't add the three on I AM 39(that is my actual age btw not your stupid ridiculous afterthoughts!) and will be 40 in August GET IT.

poet123

AnthonyUK wrote: »

Don't pick on me and make fun of me like the rest of them did:I hate YOUUUUUU!!!!!! Didn't add the three on I AM 39 and will be 40 in August GET IT.

OK, that does it for me now, no reasonable "adult" would have posted that, you are either having MH/personality disorder issues (in which case I sympathise and apologise for anything I have posted which caused you aggravation) or you are a troll, a word I rarely use, because it is rarely true.

Here, only one or the other of those explanations could be correct. I will not place you on ignore, but will no longer engage with you. Either way you need help, now.

AnthonyUK

poet123 wrote: »

OK, that does it for me now, no reasonable "adult" would have posted that, you are either having MH/personality disorder issues (in which case I sympathise and apologise for anything I have posted which caused you aggravation) or you are a troll, a word I rarely use, because it is rarely true.

Here, only one or the other of those explanations could be correct. I will not place you on ignore, but will no longer engage with you. Either way you need help, now.

And you need to leave me alone.

jimbms

eeee let's all have a nice cup of tea.