We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
725,000 public sector jobs face axe, economist warns
Comments
-
Polio vaccine is something for the good of the world. The LCD is of purely commercial value, so no comparison.
Whoa there dude.
Assertion is that the public sector don't create anything.
Example is given of a public sector contribution to society, which was created, & has benefitted the majority of the human race.
Response is: "that doesn't count as it doesn't fit my arguement!"
Your logic is way flawed.
If vaccines are not of commercial value why do:
a)drugs cost so much
and
b) pharmaceutical companies invest so heavily in research?
Answer - because they saw how profitable it could be.
The comparison is absolutely valid and correct.It's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.0 -
I would suggest that deciding not to patent a vaccine is a moral decision and open to debate as to whether right or wrong. The invention of a purely commercial item such as LCD should have been patented and a return given to the people who funded the research. ie the taxpayer.0
-
I would suggest that deciding not to patent a vaccine is a moral decision and open to debate as to whether right or wrong. The invention of a purely commercial item such as LCD should have been patented and a return given to the people who funded the research. ie the taxpayer.
Are you saying that pharmaceutical companies are immoral & all drug patents should be removed?It's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.0 -
lemonjelly wrote: »Are you saying that pharmaceutical companies are immoral & all drug patents should be removed?
No I am not, but if they chose not to patent an item it is up to them.
When public money is used to fund a PURELY COMMERCIAL invention though, it is reasonable to expect the people who paid for the research and development to get a return.0 -
thescouselander wrote: »
Also, some parts of the public sector do "Create" useful things - did you know Liquid Crystal Displays were invented in the UK by a public sector organisation? The same goes for many other inventions in common use today.
Well, another example is that the world wide web was invented by CERN, and the computer was invented in the University of Manchester, both using publically funded money.
Y'all wouldn't be able to call the public sector scum on this forum without the public sector having invested its money.“The ideas of debtor and creditor as to what constitutes a good time never coincide.”
― P.G. Wodehouse, Love Among the Chickens0 -
Well, another example is that the world wide web was invented by CERN, and the computer was invented in the University of Manchester, both using publically funded money.
Y'all wouldn't be able to call the public sector scum on this forum without the public sector having invested its money.
If they had pateneted this and a license fee of say £1.00 had been payable on every computer in the world, we would have had an education system that would be the envy of the world. Another opportunity missed by the public sector.0 -
thescouselander wrote: »Yes, its entirely true. Unfortuntly the opportunity wasn't taken to capitalise on the patent but thats really down to government policy rather than any wrongdoing on the part of the inventors.
It is also true that 55% of the important inventions in the history of planet earth have originated in little old UK (according to a Japanese study), I should imagine that many of the modern ones have come through public sector universities, patent should come first, the moralising later
'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
I would dispute your claim that most CS are front line, from the departments I have known there appear to be whole levels of lower, middle and higher managers who seem to do very little of any use to anyone.
PS. It was not me that called anyone scum.
You are a true idiot if you believe that an organisation can be run without managers. You need managers in any large organisation and it's for you to say who needs to be work where.0 -
The_White_Horse wrote: »it is irrelevant if people in the public sector pay taxes. you don't "create" anything. you just filter the same money around.
It's not the job of the public sector to create anything. The job of the public sector is to carry out government business, without which the nation cannot be properly governed.0 -
Well, another example is that the world wide web was invented by CERN, and the computer was invented in the University of Manchester, both using publically funded money.
Y'all wouldn't be able to call the public sector scum on this forum without the public sector having invested its money.
Also Rutherford (from New Zealand) first split the atom at Manchester University, perhaps a more debatable benefit to mankind, although I think we have still to see how that will turn out (could be good or bad).'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards