does anyone know what this dress is?

lindaatno9

anderson8 wrote: »

didnt know that about her not be allowed to use that picture.

will try and put a pic up later when i can find my camera

thank you for all the support, this is why i love this place

Using an image is a copyright offence. Unless she has the permission from the photographer which I doubt!

lindaatno9

shellsuit wrote: »

Oh I'm glad I didn't cause offence ~ phew! :rotfl:

Have you ever had a stand at a wedding fayre to drum up some more business?

?

TBH I have had exposure in Perfect Wedding and the You and your wedding forum, Real weddings, so at the moment my books are closed!! It's been a fab year and I am totally in love with each and every project I am working on. I hope to have a breather later in the year to put some things together but I have to see. Members here have been awesome in putting their trust in me. I love this place.

shellsuit

lindaatno9 wrote: »

TBH I have had exposure in Perfect Wedding and the You and your wedding forum, Real weddings, so at the moment my books are closed!! It's been a fab year and I am totally in love with each and every project I am working on. I hope to have a breather later in the year to put some things together but I have to see. Members here have been awesome in putting their trust in me. I love this place.

Oh of course, I forgot about the mag!! :T

anderson8

ive told her i will contact trading standards and this was her reply

i have sent you what is in the photo - just in another colour which is stated in the listing. i used the original sellers photo and they made the dress to that photo. contact who you like i used the photo provided to me by the person i bought the dress from originaly so it is them they will have to go to. "

if i go to trading standards, how can i claim its a copy if i dont know the original model number for the dress

anderson8

haha
we won!
shes giving me a refund!

shellsuit

HOw did she change her mind in such a short space of time?

You must have frightened her mentioning trading standards lol

lindaatno9

Result!!! What she should have done is photographed the dress herself to sell on. She was in breech of copyright using a photo even if it was from the original seller.
Whoop whoop to you!! :beer:

anderson8

i think i must have.
unbelievable some of the points that she was trying to argue...

anderson8

lindaatno9 wrote: »

Result!!! What she should have done is photographed the dress herself to sell on. She was in breech of copyright using a photo even if it was from the original seller.
Whoop whoop to you!! :beer:

ill try and get a pic of the dress and show you all, then you will see why she probably didnt take a pic of the actual dress!

anderson8

http://i893.photobucket.com/albums/ac134/shezrez8/26052010014.jpg

thats the best i could do on my camera phone,
its not shiny due to a nice shiny satin, its the crap satin that you used to have to wear if you were a queen/flower girl/fairy at a gala day.
i also hadnt noticed before but its covered in pin parks from when its been made