We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
How bad is this?
Comments
-
Wow, that was a quick change round natwill, what changed your mind? Have you spoken to your solicitor about it yet?When I had my loft converted back into a loft, the neighbours came around and scoffed, and called me retro.0
-
My lender will value flat as a one bed, which knocks alot off the value.
Indemity covers me for converting back to a one bed but not for loss in value of flat. I was paying 285k, as a one bed not worth this.
And I suspect very difficult to sell. for 285k I could get a fab one bed but I wanted a 2 bed....0 -
And it goes on, vendor is now applying for retrospectibe building cert...
If council give it I will still buy, if not its a one bed flat which will be revalued downwards significantly0 -
Now that sounds like a very positive step - best of luck with it, I really hope it works out well for you. Please let us know!0
-
natwill wrote:Thank you...I must admit the 4 year / 10 year I don't follow.
Can anyone explain the 4 year / 10 year rule?
Alteration done 7 years ago, and I thought if more than 10 years old buildings regs were a moot point?
Thanks alot
Frazzled in London
The four year rule applies to planning permission - or lack of it. No enforcement can be taken regarding the alterations, if no planning permission was obtained, once the works have been "substantially completed" for four years.
The ten year rule relates to change of use. Where a property or land has been used for a different purpose, no enforcement action can be taken once that new purpose has been in use for ten years.
Your issue doesn't seem to involve change of use, which would cover a residential building being converted to commercial/business use, for example.
Not 100% sure of the limit on building control, but I think it's four years.
HTHWarning ..... I'm a peri-menopausal axe-wielding maniac
0 -
well done natwill, been watching your post and pleased yourve pulled out, i feel thers far better out there for you:DYou're not drunk if you can lie on the floor without holding on0
-
Mmmm...turns out the blt vendor who lives abroad has just put down a big deposit on a new flat (why!!!)
Getting retrospective building cert and planning will take about 2 months per council
Pondering going for a price reduction and an indemnity policy from vendor.
Slightly blinded by my desperation to move I admit!
Vendor is coming back with a price reduction on 285K for 2 bed which should be one bed
Bl@@@dy glad I read all these posts or I would have bought as is. FTB unless they have 30% deposit will not be able to get a mortgage on current valuation of 2850 -
Debt_Free_Chick wrote:The four year rule applies to planning permission - or lack of it. No enforcement can be taken regarding the alterations, if no planning permission was obtained, once the works have been "substantially completed" for four years.
The ten year rule relates to change of use. Where a property or land has been used for a different purpose, no enforcement action can be taken once that new purpose has been in use for ten years.
Your issue doesn't seem to involve change of use, which would cover a residential building being converted to commercial/business use, for example.
Not 100% sure of the limit on building control, but I think it's four years.
HTH
Thanks for that, I rang Council who were full of doom and gloom and said regardless that they cd insist/enforce a change back even after 7 years????0 -
Each flat gets own building ins and my solicitor pointed out no cover for foundations or roof so vendor got an indemnity policy for me then a day later this
You need to get this sorted out too, it's a no no.I'm surprised the lender hasn't mentioned it (yet)..... This rings a great big bell marked "freehold flat" which will cause any sensible lender (or buyer) to head straight for the exit.Sit your solicitor down and get him to explain this matter to you properly.Has he confirmed that the indemnity policy is adequate ( I wouldn't be happy with this, especially given all the other problems).
Start by reading the introduction on this site:
https://www.lease-advice.orgTrying to keep it simple...
0 -
Thank you...yes there is now an indemnity policy in place for this:-)
I chose the worst flat possible, resigned to staying where I am to be honest and moving next year unless present vendor comes back with a lower price (I offerd asking!)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards