We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Stolen Diamonds
Comments
-
Cakey
I've just noticed in your original post that you say that the ring was purchased in the sale.
So to get you a different ring in the correct size may well have been more expensive.
Could this be what they were saying about the difference in price?
I still think the owner of the shop was to blame by assuring you that the original ring could be re-sized - it's hard to understand why she was so clueless.
If you take rl290's way forward, your letter should be concise, to-the-point, factual and un-emotional.
Let us know how you get on.0 -
Regardless of whether the ring is worth less i too would not be happy.
I would insist on a refund and go else where... at the end of the day if they cannot be sure of having the ring back to you before the wedding whats the point???0 -
The Facts:
The ring was purchased and became the property of the buyer.
It was the wrong size, but was purchased on the express understanding that it could be resized. This is a contract term.
As agreed, the buyer later returned the ring to the jeweller for resizing. The ring that came back was not the original, a fact admitted by the jeweller.
The substitution was made without the owners consent.
The jeweller had no intention of returning the original ring.
The new ring had fewer stones [15 as opposed to 18, and of lower overall caratage]. The qualitative difference, if any, is not known. The stones were not from the original ring, as the new ring was a substitution.
When the customer complained, the jeweller agreed to see if some stones [3] from the first ring could be fitted in order to make up the original number [18].
When the customer stated that if this was not possible, she wanted the 3 loose stones, this was refused.
The jeweller has broken the purchase contract and has technically committed theft.
Way forward: Complete refund plus compensation. Sue in small claims court if necessary."Never underestimate the mindless force of a government bureaucracyseeking to expand its power, dominion and budget"Jay Stanley, American Civil Liberties Union.0 -
thank you for all of your replies. we have been givien the contact details of the trades body for jewellers. I am going to contact them as i got no where witht he jeweller. they are refusing to refund.
So i am going to reprt them to the trades body and show them my certificates. If that goes nowhere i will go through small claims
STARTING BALANCE JAN 09 £47,400
Debt left 24th December 2010 - 13611!!!!!:j
Update may 2013 - debt left £8000
Update oct 2014 - £25000
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards