We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Quoted mpg figure v's actual mpg

1246

Comments

  • Vauxhall Meriva 1.7 CDTi. Claimed 56.5mpg (combined) with the following from Vx "The driving performance figures shown are attainable when the vehicle is empty, plus a load of 200 kilograms."
    I consistently get 55 -60mpg depending on whether motorway around 65 - 70mph or local rural roads. Very little town/city driving. Aircon on most times except when outside temp is too low for it to operate.
  • gaz_jones
    gaz_jones Posts: 5,179 Forumite
    BMW 330Ci Clubsport - Claimed 31mpg combined - Actual 22mpg, although this is mainly town driving and A roads.
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  • decsdad
    decsdad Posts: 265 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Would like to see how the new breed of super efficient deisels claimed figures compare to some real life figures.(eg Bluemotions, greenline, efficient dynamics, econetic etc)
  • focae
    focae Posts: 147 Forumite
    gaz_jones wrote: »
    BMW 330Ci Clubsport - Claimed 31mpg combined - Actual 22mpg, although this is mainly town driving and A roads.

    So why are you comparing quoted combined figures to actual urban figures?
  • Flearoy
    Flearoy Posts: 274 Forumite
    Previous car, 1996/P Ford Mondeo 1.8LX estate (115 hp Zetec engine), did 33 mpg. Current car 2001/51 Ford Mondeo 1.8LX estate (125 hp Duratec engine), 30 mpg. This is on my short urban/rural commute. Nice to know that in 5 years, engine technology has progressed so much I get 10% less miles to the gallon :(

    PS - I'm aware this is not the most scientific test!
    Skip dipper and proud....
  • custardy
    custardy Posts: 38,365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Flearoy wrote: »
    Previous car, 1996/P Ford Mondeo 1.8LX estate (115 hp Zetec engine), did 33 mpg. Current car 2001/51 Ford Mondeo 1.8LX estate (125 hp Duratec engine), 30 mpg. This is on my short urban/rural commute. Nice to know that in 5 years, engine technology has progressed so much I get 10% less miles to the gallon :(

    PS - I'm aware this is not the most scientific test!

    in 5 years there is also far more weight to lug around with added safety gubbins
  • gaz_jones
    gaz_jones Posts: 5,179 Forumite
    focae wrote: »
    So why are you comparing quoted combined figures to actual urban figures?

    Because those are the only figures I had to hand. I've made it clear what I am comparing.
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  • Flearoy
    Flearoy Posts: 274 Forumite
    custardy wrote: »
    in 5 years there is also far more weight to lug around with added safety gubbins

    Yup, you're right. Funnily enough, my old Mondeo was written off after being hit by an older gent in a Honda Civic. My Mondeo did not do well at all. Remembering that, I'll not complain again about 3mpg!
    Skip dipper and proud....
  • decsdad wrote: »
    Would like to see how the new breed of super efficient deisels claimed figures compare to some real life figures.(eg Bluemotions, greenline, efficient dynamics, econetic etc)

    See my post 33 above for Efficient Dynamics....

    I used to get just over 50mpg around town when i first had it but then the novelty of having the engine cutting in and out wore out and started to irritate me so just tend to leave the clutch in or turn it off...

    Its quite useful at traffic lights when you have a propoer pause, but a complete pain in the !!! when shuffling along in a queue!

    I should add that on a motorway run the BMW 118d ticks along nicely at 60+mpg even when making (un)reasonable progress...
  • cyclonebri1
    cyclonebri1 Posts: 12,827 Forumite
    gaz_jones wrote: »
    Because those are the only figures I had to hand. I've made it clear what I am comparing.


    Maybe focae would like to expand on where your figures differ from the urban/combined ones, :question::question::question::question:
    I like the thanks button, but ,please, an I agree button.

    Will the grammar and spelling police respect I do make grammatical errors, and have carp spelling, no need to remind me.;)

    Always expect the unexpected:eek:and then you won't be dissapointed
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.