We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
House hunters out in force
Comments
-
So can we agree that the OP and the other that agreed with them are talking rubbish now?
My workings out were to show that the OP and others were talking rubbish with their suggestion that after 3 months you would have 18/21 new seller but 750 new buyers. Simple maths could have told them they were not making sense.
I have used the data in the article. Every month each agent sells 6/7.(as per the article). It's not unreasonable to extrapolate that these will be replaced by an equal number.
So every 3 months there will be 18/21 new properties per agent.
The article also suggests that 250 potential buyers register with each agent every month. So that's 750 every 3 months.
So every 3 months there are 18/21 new properties and 750 potential buyers for each agent.If I don't reply to your post,
you're probably on my ignore list.0 -
the_flying_pig wrote: »
p.s. I didn't realise Rinoa was lurking on here - he is the worst class of troll imaginable. Everything Hamish says is more or less on the verge of being plausible, it's just a highly biased interpretation of the facts, but Rinoa, dearie me... on HPC he once described the Rightmove index as "a leading indicator" of actual sold prices. I had a terrible choking/laughter fit upon reading the page on which he'd gushed that little kidney stone of wisdom.
I could well have described Rightmove as a leading indicator that closely tracks indices of sold prices (which it does).
If you can find the post exactly as you have illustrated I'll donate another £20 to Sue's holiday fund.
(Wageslave ~ don't bother looking ~ it's not there)If I don't reply to your post,
you're probably on my ignore list.0 -
-
Graham_Devon wrote: »Can you not see that this is basically an impossibility?0
-
I could well have described Rightmove as a leading indicator that closely tracks indices of sold prices (which it does).
...
that's just wrong. rightmove's all time peak was in spring/summer 2008, almost a year after the halifax peak of summer 2007. it's beyond obvious that any kind of "leading indicator" would have peaked sooner rather than later. RM is a very messy index whose month-by-month variations are almost entirely explainable by seasonal factors, mix variations, and fluctuations in time to sell. it is not, by any stretch of the imagination, a lead indicator of the haliwide indices....If you can find the post exactly as you have illustrated I'll donate another £20 to Sue's holiday fund...
the search function on HPC is rubbish. especially when it comes to banned posters.FACT.0 -
the_flying_pig wrote: »that's just wrong. rightmove's all time peak was in spring/summer 2008, almost a year after the halifax peak of summer 2007. it's beyond obvious that any kind of "leading indicator" would have peaked sooner rather than later. RM is a very messy index whose month-by-month variations are almost entirely explainable by seasonal factors, mix variations, and fluctuations in time to sell. it is not, by any stretch of the imagination, a lead indicator of the haliwide indices.
the search function on HPC is rubbish. especially when it comes to banned posters.
Hmmm. So you're blaming the search function eh?
Anyhow, here's a graph of all the indices:
http://www.houseprices.uk.net/graphs/
Rightmove maybe a tad erratic, but it broadly tracks the other indices and was clearly the first to spot the house price recovery of 2009 ~ as correctly predicted by the soon to be banned bulls at the time.If I don't reply to your post,
you're probably on my ignore list.0 -
-
not really Grahm - you could quite easily register with 2 or 3 agents so you could easily bring this number down.
I've never registered with an agent.
Whenever I've been in the market to buy, I simply review the areas I'm interested in and contact the selling agents directly to arrange a viewing.
Maybe it depends on areas as well.:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
bit of anecdotal
my brother just agreed sale of his house
1 week on the market
two offers
took offer from buyer who has mortgage approved and is currently in rented0 -
bit of anecdotal
my brother just agreed sale of his house
1 week on the market
two offers
took offer from buyer who has mortgage approved and is currently in rented
Is your brother buying another property or moving to rented?:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards