Age 7 government child trust fund payments not being released!!!

Deepmistrust

^^good grief, are you not all whined out by now?

Get over it, no matter how many banshee wails you do, it will never ever change the fact, you are scrapping the barrell in order to find something hypocritical in me telling a single 19 year old lad that the best way to increase his income would be to work more that 1 day a week.

I'm not sure if you've been in a trance the last week or so, but it's been YOU whining on and on how people are better off on benefits.

I've stated all along that those in work are in a better financial position than those out of it.

Are you honestly disputing that?

LMAO, are you hoping that no one will go back and check your whining on-and-on posts for themselves or something?

liam8282

Deepmistrust wrote: »

^^good grief, are you not all whined out by now?

Still defending myself against your constant attacks.

Get over it, no matter how many banshee wails you do,

Get to the point, don't try to make it look like your writing something interesting, when you fill half of your statements up with garbage like this.

it will never ever change the fact, you are scrapping the barrell in order to find something hypocritical in me telling a single 19 year old lad that the best way to increase his income would be to work more that 1 day a week.

I guess we agree on this all of a sudden then?

I'm not sure if you've been in a trance the last week or so, but it's been YOU whining on and on how people are better off on benefits.

No, how people can abuse the system to the extent that they can make a significant profit from it.

Also, how people can gain an equivalent income by choosing not work.

Seriously, will you take a mental note of this, because quite frankly I am sick of writing it for you.

I've stated all along that those in work are in a better financial position than those out of it.

Who has disagreed with that?

Are you honestly disputing that?

No.

What I did say was the point above, I am not going to repeat it for you again.

LMAO, are you hoping that no one will go back and check your whining on-and-on posts for themselves or something?

That is the beauty of it, people can read everything that has been written here and come to their own conclusion.

No matter how many times you care to repeat the same old stuff, over and over and over again.

liam8282

I've stated all along that those in work are in a better financial position than those out of it.

Who has disagreed with that?

I have made an error here, it has been proven that those who don't work can be financially better off than those that work.

Deepmistrust

liam8282 wrote: »

I've stated all along that those in work are in a better financial position than those out of it.

Who has disagreed with that?

I have made an error here, it has been proven that those who don't work can be financially better off than those that work.

"Who has disagreed with that?"

You, you hypocritical half-wit.

Or else what have you spent the last week whining for?

(your errors are of no consequence, they are...like your dullness...an inevitable consequence of a drone-like mind).

liam8282

Deepmistrust wrote: »

(your errors are of no consequence, they are...like your dullness...an inevitable consequence of a drone-like mind).

Explains all the typos you make.

Deepmistrust

liam8282 wrote: »

That is the beauty of it, people can read everything that has been written here and come to their own conclusion.

No matter how many times you care to repeat the same old stuff, over and over and over again.

Though I doubt many actually will wade through pages and pages of you whining, and me telling you the truth about yourself (lets face it - who cares about the truth about Liam the council house dweller who hates council house dwellers).

If you think you're playing to an audience (aside from the regular Daily-Mail reading foamers) - well that just makes me giggle even more:rotfl:

leveller2911

Ive booked you two a room.Just leave the keys at the reception desk on your way out.....;):D

LizzieS_2

A thread ideal for deepmistrust
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/2526117

The rest of us can then discuss good/bad/improvements to the current system.

Deepmistrust

LizzieS wrote: »

A thread ideal for deepmistrust
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/2526117

The rest of us can then discuss good/bad/improvements to the current system.

Witter away to your hearts content.

Working classes whining and demanding even less for even poor working classes, is exactly what you are supposed to be doing with your time and energy. Heaven forbid you should not divert your attention from the poorest to the richest, and ask why.

(I'm not convinced you lot grasp the concept of asking questions tbph).

Still I'm sure someone up there appreciates your efforts at keeping the poor, poor.

Still not to worry, there is a very nice section in tomorrows Daily Mail (Have it on very good authority) about middle-class women and their cats and cat fashion. Should make you go all "oooh I wanna be like that", and keep you dreaming for a few weeks at least :rotfl:

LizzieS_2

I hate cats and I don't read your Daily Mail either (I see some of the stories though as they are all over MSE).

I wouldn't keep the poor poor, I would make sure some developed a sense of responsibility for their upkeep, so I could then widen the benefits for a few more who deserve help.

Now you on the other hand appear to want to leave the system as it is, thereby continuing to refuse some more needy people.