We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

which party protected our homes more in recession?

1356

Comments

  • MissMoneypenny
    MissMoneypenny Posts: 5,324 Forumite
    ninky wrote: »
    presumably they could afford the mortgage when they took it out otherwise they wouldn't have got it.

    That wasn't how mortgages were working for the last few years. People have been able to lie to buy and/or have taken out interest only mortgages with no repayment vehicle in place.

    There were plenty of warnings about "can you afford this mortgage if the interest rate goes to 12%" but some stuck their heads in the financial sand.
    RENTING? Have you checked to see that your landlord has permission from their mortgage lender to rent the property? If not, you could be thrown out with very little notice.
    Read the sticky on the House Buying, Renting & Selling board.


  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Kohoutek wrote: »
    I'm just asking people to apply common sense, which you and others are incapable of doing.
    why do you think you are correct and the one applying common sense Mr Coconut?
    are other peoples views not common sense and only yours are common sense

    take those blinkers off before you get run over crossing the road
  • Kohoutek
    Kohoutek Posts: 2,861 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 2 March 2010 at 5:37PM
    chucky wrote: »
    why do you think you are correct and the one applying common sense Mr Coconut?
    are other peoples views not common sense and only yours are common sense

    take those blinkers off before you get run over crossing the road

    All I'm saying is that lenders repaying £300 billion to the government, higher interest rates and the end of QE, two to three years down the line is not going to be positive for the housing market.

    You can call that blinkered, I'll call it common sense.

    I'm only repeating what the Council of Mortgage Lender's most recent report says (someone posted it a while ago).

    I guess you know better than them.
  • Dan:_4
    Dan:_4 Posts: 3,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    they are under Labour whose idea of fairness is not to give everyone the same chance, but simply to take from those who have to give to those who have not. That is not fairness at all.

    lifes not fair mate.
  • MissMoneypenny
    MissMoneypenny Posts: 5,324 Forumite
    Dan: wrote: »
    lifes not fair mate.

    Try telling that to those that are going to lose their house.
    RENTING? Have you checked to see that your landlord has permission from their mortgage lender to rent the property? If not, you could be thrown out with very little notice.
    Read the sticky on the House Buying, Renting & Selling board.


  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Kohoutek wrote: »
    All I'm saying is that lenders repaying £300 billion to the government, higher interest rates and the end of QE, two to three years down the line is not going to be positive for the housing market.

    You can call that blinkered, I'll call it common sense.

    I'm only repeating what the Council of Mortgage Lender's most recent report says (someone posted it a while ago).

    I guess you know better than them.
    lol - no. but what i do know is that whatever government comes into power they're not going to be putting the country back into recession or forcing house prices downwards.before it happens the issue will be solved by the CML.

    do you really think that they will allow this to happen?
  • Dan:_4
    Dan:_4 Posts: 3,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Try telling that to those that are going to lose their house.

    This is far worse then the poster above moaning about his savings taking a hit due to current interest rates.
  • MissMoneypenny
    MissMoneypenny Posts: 5,324 Forumite
    chucky wrote: »
    lol or forcing house prices downwards.

    Forcing house prices downwards??? In the previous busts, nobody forced house prices down.
    RENTING? Have you checked to see that your landlord has permission from their mortgage lender to rent the property? If not, you could be thrown out with very little notice.
    Read the sticky on the House Buying, Renting & Selling board.


  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    No one will force house prices down.

    That doesn't mean that house prices will not be naturally pulled down by economic conditions without stimulus. Hecne the very reason of stimulus.
  • Kohoutek
    Kohoutek Posts: 2,861 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    chucky wrote: »
    lol - no. but what i do know is that whatever government comes into power they're not going to be putting the country back into recession or forcing house prices downwards.before it happens the issue will be solved by the CML.

    do you really think that they will allow this to happen?

    The government won't continue QE and 0.5% interest rates in the medium term, even if they know it will negatively impact house prices.

    The CML don't have a solution to the funding gap that will fully support the mortgage market.

    "The loss of investor confidence in wholesale debt markets left a £300 billion funding gap that has only been filled on a temporary basis by government funds under the special liquidity and credit guarantee schemes. These schemes expire between 2011 and 2014, leaving uncertainty about how far, and through what sources, lenders will be able to refinance this funding.

    Retail deposits will not be large enough to fill the gap. But the government has not yet recognised the need for a strategy to put mortgage funding markets back on a sustainable footing. Unless it does so, the likelihood is that the mortgage market will shrink."

    http://www.cml.org.uk/cml/media/press/2527

    It's not a question of allowing it to happen, it's the absence of any solutions. The government could make more loans but I think it's very unlikely given by 2012-2014 they'll be reducing the deficit and looking to unwind the bank bailout guarantees etc too.

    I'm sure the government accepts that protecting the housing market is important, but not at the expense of our currency (QE + ZIRP) and reducing the deficit in the future (continuing bailouts and guarantees like the CML one).
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.