can a debt be enforced?

DGJsaver

Think leveller is on the wrong forum ?

leveller2911

immoral_angeluk wrote: »

Originally Posted by leveller2911
I wonder how people like you can sleep at night. Do you have any moral justification for giving idiots like the OP advice when anyone with an ounce of common sense and morals would just ignore them and not even bother to post a reply.

You telling me you really can't see how that's rude and insulting?

What I find more insulting TBH is people giving advice on how to get out of paying back money they borrow(in effect stealing).......Now thats insulting ..Especially when there are no mitigating circumstances.....

immoral_angeluk

leveller2911 wrote: »

What I find more insulting TBH is people giving advice on how to get out of paying back money they borrow(in effect stealing).......Now thats insulting ..

Its not advice on how to get out of paying, it's merely stating the law. Fact is if the creditor takes the OP to court he'd get a CCJ and the 6 years would start again anyway if my memory serves me rightly.

There's nothing immoral or insulting about stating the facts.
What IS insulting is getting on your high horse and being needlessly rude and aggressive when people are trying to help by giving the OP as much information as possible.

leveller2911

DGJsaver wrote: »

Think leveller is on the wrong forum ?

Think Ive been on the site for long enough to know.

Tixy

leveller2911 wrote: »

Not a "no win no fee" solicitor are you??? Ambulance chaser??. Nope

So you don't have any moral dilemma? . Nope - educating people about the law is a good thing.

So if you were cold called by a builder saying your roof was knackered and needed a new one,quoting £10k to repair it.You knew it was not true and sent him on his way,Only to see him knock at your elderly neighbours house, Old Mrs Miggins (recently lost her husband of some 50 yrs) would you intervene and tell her to get rid of him????

:rotfl:How amusing that you could think the 2 situations are even remotely comparable - perhaps that sheds some light on what it is you do for a living.
Or perhaps that was as close an analogy you could come up with where you think people would agree with it - if so it really wasn't very good at all.

DGJsaver

leveller2911 wrote: »

Think Ive been on the site for long enough to know.

Then perhaps you should re read the board guidelines , namely being non judgmental

immoral_angeluk

leveller2911 wrote: »

Think Ive been on the site for long enough to know.

Then by now you should understand the trolling policy?

leveller2911

immoral_angeluk wrote: »

Its not advice on how to get out of paying, it's merely stating the law. Fact is if the creditor takes the OP to court he'd get a CCJ and the 6 years would start again anyway if my memory serves me rightly.


So why not make a judgement and not bother,let them find it out for themselves.

I do have sympathy with some people,especially when theyve lost a loved one,BUT the truth is too many newbies come on here to "try it on",chancers who don't deserve sympathy nor pity.

immoral_angeluk

leveller2911 wrote: »

So why not make a judgement and not bother,let them find it out for themselves.

I do have sympathy with some people,especially when theyve lost a loved one,BUT the truth is too many newbies come on here to "try it on",chancers who don't deserve sympathy nor pity.

I can understand what you're saying but people come on here for advice. It's up to them what they do with the information they are given.
Never judge a man until you've walked a mile in his shoes. You never know the full story so sometimes you just have to take people at face value and help them as much as you can.

DGJsaver

Leveller , i can see where your coming from but in my opinion , what your getting at is best reserved for in the money saving arms...