We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Change of hours
Comments
-
DaisyFlower wrote: »Nothing wrong with those hours, mornings free and every weekend off. The majority of men and women I know work far longer hours than 34 a week to support their families.
Your OH could always work part time as well as yourself if this was truly about spending more time with your child, however given all your questions are about gaining more money from the system I doubt family time is your true motivation.
so your saying i want more money rather than spend time with my family????? all you people dont understand, yea i can under stand with you if i was from another country and didnt work and claimed everythink,
so all you people are telling me you dont have any family or friend on 16 hours a week with a child, like i said your quick to judge other people but if it was your family or friend i bet you wouldnt be saying this to them0 -
so your saying i want more money rather than spend time with my family????? all you people dont understand, yea i can under stand with you if i was from another country and didnt work and claimed everythink,
so all you people are telling me you dont have any family or friend on 16 hours a week with a child, like i said your quick to judge other people but if it was your family or friend i bet you wouldnt be saying this to them
No I dont, all my friends and family work. Some of the mums work part time but the husbands all do full time hours. The single mums I know also work full time. I dont actually know anybody in a couple where the mum stays home and the father works just 16 hours.
For the record, if a family member or friend did this I would be disappointed that they let the state pick up the cost of raising their family.0 -
all ive got to say is this is the last time i will be coming on this site i asked for advice and all you get is people who are rude, i supose it would of been different if i said i have had to take a cut in hours due to lack of work and i will be on around 16 a week, very rude people who like to judge people0
-
Just wondering how working those hours only adds up to 34.5. I'm guessing you are deducted an hour for lunch per day? So by my reckoning that's 40 hours a week?0
-
DaisyFlower wrote: »Nothing wrong with those hours, mornings free and every weekend off. The majority of men and women I know work far longer hours than 34 a week to support their families.
Your OH could always work part time as well as yourself if this was truly about spending more time with your child, however given all your questions are about gaining more money from the system I doubt family time is your true motivation.snapping_crocodile wrote: »Just wondering how working those hours only adds up to 34.5. I'm guessing you are deducted an hour for lunch per day? So by my reckoning that's 40 hours a week?
sorry thats corrct 8 hours a day work0 -
do what you feel is right i can totally understand what your saying. you wont get these years back with your son and at the end of the day if you dont claim the money some imagrant will. i work 30 hours a week and dont claim now but did when my husband left suddenly leaving me with 2 young children to support. if your son went off the rails when he is older they would then blame you the parents for not having time for them as a child. well done for being a good mum im sure if you didnt have to claim benifits you wouldnt but your child comes first.0
-
so your saying i want more money rather than spend time with my family????? all you people dont understand, yea i can under stand with you if i was from another country and didnt work and claimed everythink,
so all you people are telling me you dont have any family or friend on 16 hours a week with a child, like i said your quick to judge other people but if it was your family or friend i bet you wouldnt be saying this to them
I don't know anybody who does this. But, I've known plenty of families where both parents work full time. I've also got a friend who was a single parent who used to work 70 hours a week. Some people don't have children they can't afford and work hard to provide for their families. Some people have self respect.0 -
kerry13238 wrote: »do what you feel is right i can totally understand what your saying. you wont get these years back with your son and at the end of the day if you dont claim the money some imagrant will. i work 30 hours a week and dont claim now but did when my husband left suddenly leaving me with 2 young children to support. if your son went off the rails when he is older they would then blame you the parents for not having time for them as a child. well done for being a good mum im sure if you didnt have to claim benifits you wouldnt but your child comes first.
somebody that understands, thanks,,0 -
kerry13238 wrote: »do what you feel is right i can totally understand what your saying. you wont get these years back with your son and at the end of the day if you dont claim the money some imagrant will. i work 30 hours a week and dont claim now but did when my husband left suddenly leaving me with 2 young children to support. if your son went off the rails when he is older they would then blame you the parents for not having time for them as a child. well done for being a good mum im sure if you didnt have to claim benifits you wouldnt but your child comes first.
I dont think he is a mum, his partner is home full time so doubt the child will be going off the rails.
As for the quote "im sure if you didnt have to claim benifits you wouldnt" - if you read the thread he doesnt have to claim benefits as he works 34 hours but wants to claim more benefits so that he can just work 16.0 -
DaisyFlower wrote: »I dont he is a mum, his partner is home full time so doubt the child will be going off the rails.
As for the quote "im sure if you didnt have to claim benifits you wouldnt" - if you read the thread he doesnt have to claim benefits as he works 34 hours but wants to claim more benefits so that he can just work 16.
so what yor saying is i want to claim more benafits???? WRONG i want to spend more time with my son, i tell you what i could always be like the rest of the BENAFITS PEOPLE and not work and that would be even batter i wouldnt have to pay for nothing,
;);)
and as for your comment DaisyFlower i never had a father around when i was young so your saying a child doesnt need there father as long as there mother is there? what ever0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards