Atos medical assessment, something weird happend, advice needed

louiseg0151

To Just-A-Quick-Visit: I'm sure it's not just me that thinks this but you have been totally disrespectful and completely trashed another forum members thread to get your point across in a number of insensitive and seemingly agressive posts.

Just-A-Quick-Visit

Can you help BBC TV expose ESA medicals?
23 February 2010

---

BBC television to investigate problems with ESA
The BBC's current affairs department is investigating the difficulties people face when trying to claim ESA, for a television documentary. The programme aims to highlight claimants' experiences with the new system and to investigate why people with genuine illnesses and disabilities are being declared fit to work. Do you, for example, believe the results of your Atos assessment are wrong? Or perhaps you do not think they reflect the answers you gave to the doctor at the time.
“If you've had a problem claiming ESA and would like to discuss your experience, then please contact Liam McDougall as soon as possible on 0141 422 7559 or liam-mcdougall@bbc-co-uk

The captialization of my text is not shouting, my manor is very direct, some people do not like that.

Sorry to the original poster. Would everyone prefer a seperate thread for my content ?

Maybe im over reacting. Maybe Atos are honorable, Maybe some people dont like to see solutions, Is this the sympathy board or did the original thread starter request help and assistance ?

I will leave if requested to do so by a mod. If that is the case I will never blacken your shores again.

healy

Just-A-Quick-Visit wrote: »

Oxymoron of the year 2010





LMFAO

Have a look in the stickies if you do not believe me, yawn.

Just-A-Quick-Visit

Convention for the Protection
of Human Rights
and Fundamental Freedoms
as amended by Protocol No. 11
with Protocol Nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, 12 and 13


The text of the Convention had been amended according to the provisions of
Protocol No. 3 (ETS No. 45), which entered into force on 21 September 1970,
of Protocol No. 5 (ETS No. 55), which entered into force on 20 December 1971
and of Protocol No. 8 (ETS No. 118), which entered into force on 1 January
1990, and comprised also the text of Protocol No. 2 (ETS No. 44) which, in
accordance with Article 5, paragraph 3 thereof, had been an integral part of the
Convention since its entry into force on 21 September 1970. All provisions
which had been amended or added by these Protocols are replaced by
Protocol No. 11 (ETS No. 155), as from the date of its entry into force on
1 November 1998. As from that date, Protocol No. 9 (ETS No. 140), which
entered into force on 1 October 1994, is repealed.
Registry of the European Court of Human Rights
September 2003

Convention for the Protection
of Human Rights and
Fundamental Freedoms
Rome, 4.XI.1950

The governments signatory hereto, being members of the Council of Europe,
Considering the Universal Declaration of Human Rights proclaimed by
the General Assembly of the United Nations on 10th December 1948;
Considering that this Declaration aims at securing the universal and
effective recognition and observance of the Rights therein declared;

Considering that the aim of the Council of Europe is the achievement of
greater unity between its members and that one of the methods by
which that aim is to be pursued is the maintenance and further
realisation of human rights and fundamental freedoms;

Reaffirming their profound belief in those fundamental freedoms which
are the foundation of justice and peace in the world and are best
maintained on the one hand by an effective political democracy and on
the other by a common understanding and observance of the human
rights upon which they depend;

Being resolved, as the governments of European countries which are
like-minded and have a common heritage of political traditions, ideals,
freedom and the rule of law, to take the first steps for the collective
enforcement of certain of the rights stated in the Universal Declaration,
Have agreed as follows:

Article 1 – Obligation to respect human rights
The High Contracting Parties shall secure to everyone within their
jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in Section I of this
Convention.

I need to check my posts. I may of said article 5 instead of article 7. My mistake. I will correct where ness.

Just-A-Quick-Visit

Human rights set out in the Declaration

The following reproduces the articles of the Declaration which set out the specific human rights that are recognized in the Declaration.[14]

Article 1
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

Article 2
Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

Article 3
Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

Article 4
No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.

Article 5
No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Article 6
Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 7
All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

Article 8
Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

Article 9
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

There are many more articles, this is just a list from wikipeadia. Google UDHR 1948 for yourselves. This is a way to ensure your medical is FAIR and that you can prove it isnt fair by having it audio recorded.

Audio recording should be mandatory.

dmg24

healy wrote: »

A lot of incorrect points here but I will just mention two.

You cannot insist the medical is recorded, you can ask but it is likely to be declined. If you do get permission it will have to be carried out by a professional and the claimant will have to pay for it.

Tribunals are not biased, they are independent of the DWP.

It's a conspiracy!

Just-A-Quick-Visit

atrixblue.-MFR-. wrote: »

yes the medical starts as sopon as you step foot in the centre

Pardon me for offering correction.

The medical in actual fact starts as soon as the Atos doctor sees you from his window approaching location of your medical.

Likewise, it finishes when you vanish out of his line of sight from said windows

alwaysonthego_2

Board guide comment

Thread closed as it has become a discussion.

If you feel the need to discuss this further please start a new thread in the Discussion board found at the bottom of the forum, I am sure you recieve a good response there thanks.