Please help re flat deposit

clutton_2

EL - could you not get a photograph of her coming out of the property ?

clutton_2

:T :T :T :T :T has anyone else noticed we are at

Post number 1002 !!!!!!!!!!!!!

This surely is a record !!!!!!! :j :j :j :j :j :j

I suspect the reason that the MSE community has taken EL so much to their hearts is her inherent sense of "fair play" ; her sense of what is right, and moral; her willingness to ask for help and then go and DO something about it; her persistence and stubborness in learning all about the court system; her refusal to let redundancy get her down; the gratitude which she has shown to EVERY poster on her who has offered their opinion; but, most of all, because ( i have not met her) - she is a very lovely person !!!!!!!

How many other threads have we read in recent months - folks telling about poor accomodation, (for example) and being offered lots of really useful and helpful support, then come back to the Board with a YES - BUT response - after a while these threads die a natural death.

It is so true, that we are all keen to help others, as long as they are willing to help themselves.

EL - you have this willingness in SPADES !!!!!!!!!! :kisses: :kisses: :happylove :dance: :wave:




first time i have ever worked out how to post "smilies"

Voyager2002

clutton wrote:

:T :T :T :T :T has anyone else noticed we are at

Post number 1002 !!!!!!!!!!!!!

This surely is a record !!!!!!! :j :j :j :j :j :j

I suspect the reason that the MSE community has taken EL so much to their hearts is her inherent sense of "fair play" ; her sense of what is right, and moral; her willingness to ask for help and then go and DO something about it; her persistence and stubborness in learning all about the court system; her refusal to let redundancy get her down; the gratitude which she has shown to EVERY poster on her who has offered their opinion; but, most of all, because ( i have not met her) - she is a very lovely person !!!!!!!

How many other threads have we read in recent months - folks telling about poor accomodation, (for example) and being offered lots of really useful and helpful support, then come back to the Board with a YES - BUT response - after a while these threads die a natural death.

It is so true, that we are all keen to help others, as long as they are willing to help themselves.

EL - you have this willingness in SPADES !!!!!!!!!! :kisses: :kisses: :happylove :dance: :wave:




first time i have ever worked out how to post "smilies"

I agree with every word, and would nominate this as being thread of the year!

I was so pleased to make post number 1,000!

clutton_2

how do we get Martin to nominate this for Thread of the Year ?

EagerLearner

Hi all,

Thanks again for all the answers - you are right in saying we should attend and we def want our day in court.

I have been offered another days work today (that's 3 days under my belt already this week since coming back from Thailand, for occasional work which I wasn't expecting until next week!)

This does mean I have to leave soon and won't be back til later so prob can't work on the court stuff again today. I will call the Lewes office again and hope they can fax me a dated letter for today, with a copy of what they wrote before saying she's been on the register for ages etc.

If we are attending on Weds, there is no point sending the letter asking them to ignore her request to set aside judgement?

I guess in this case we need to focus on the bundle of paperwork we will take with us on Weds and what we are going to say.

As Auntie C righly says, we have to expect her to be vile (it comes naturally to her) and try to make us out the bad guys. In our statements we must re-iterate all the letters we sent to the only address we had been given. Plus we have to show the crucial letter from LA on her behalf wanting to negotiate, on 11th September, well after court case had begun. The letter from Lewes Reg will also be crucial - something in our weaponry that she prob has no idea that we have gotten hold of. :cool:

Amazing to see the level of posts we now have -:T thanks everyone once again for your patience while I dither and ask more and more of you - I know that I wouldn't have gotten this far without the prods, hints and tips from these very pages which have become like a second home and such a supportive place to be. :T

Thanks also Auntie C for your comments - with 3 self-employed days this week and another 3 booked for next week, it's nice to know I'm at least starting on an ok level and hit the ground running. I do have a sense of fair play (I'm a Cancerian and often far too considerate of others feelings / whether something os fair or not etc plus with a moon in Libra this means I always have to see if the scales are balanced and, again, fair!:D)

In terms of post of the month / post of the year - I noticed that the other votes for posts that won when you previously kindly nominated me, were posts that helped people more directly, so I guess this here post of ours doesn't seem to fall under that category . Still, what matters is next Wednesday 17th we have our Rocky Balboa moment against Ladlady From Hell - something that has taken months to achieve and is about more than money now.

It's about Truth! It's about Honesty! It's about Fairness!

((((the crowd cheers, the crowd unites in anticipation!)

Better get some Cheerios before heading out the door - windy day out there!

nrsql

barnaby-bear wrote:

Additionally we believe the address filed to be a c/o address and non-servable under .... insert the laws I quoted before.... , the address provided is identical to that provided as that of a decorator for one of the disputed receipts for which the deposit was witheld, a receipt lacking VAT details and other qualities of a bona fide receipt. A c/o address would be inadequate for pursuing the judgement. The letting agent was and still employed/contracted to act as the landlords agent and they were notified on mulitple occasions throughout proceedings resulting in limited response from the landlord.
(I think the fact this address is dodgy and in disputed receipt important)

Under .... law quote ... we were entitled to a servable address. This was requested via the LA on numerous ... insert evidence... occasions.

The landlord currently uses multiple names as demonstrated by.... ,

We believe the served address to still be valid because....

A receipt doesn't need VAT details - in fact if the trader isn't VAT registered it shouldn't have them.
The receipt having the same address as the LL doesn't mean it's not valid but might require some explanation.

irnbru_2

nrsql wrote:

The receipt having the same address as the LL doesn't mean it's not valid but might require some explanation.

Additionaly, no indication of other quotes being obtained will also need to be justified.

irnbru_2

EagerLearner wrote:

Plus we have to show the crucial letter from LA on her behalf wanting to negotiate, on 11th September, well after court case had begun.

Does that letter indicate she was aware of the court action?

Or are you making the assumption that the LA had told LL of the court action?

worrypants

eagerlearner

I have read through all of this thread and its taken me a day or 6!

I have learned so much

You are an inspiration so admire your tenacity and persistance and cant wait for a good outcome which i am sure there will be
Good luck

wigglygiggly

I have read all of this (in stages! lol) and what a rollercoaster of a journey. Well done EL for standing your ground and I am sending you tonnes of positive vibes to help you on your way xxxxxxxxxxxx