Warning: Postman delivering bank statements to wrong address.

vaporate

nzseries1 wrote: »

Yes, but that's 50p more than I need to spend if I simply don't go paperless!

Also, they require a year's worth of statements every year (so essentially every statement). Therefore, I'm essentially paying the bank £6.00 for what I could get for free if I simply don't go paperless.

This is a money saving site, and spending money unnecessarily is not moneysaving!

I'd rather pay a small one off fee than stay paperless.

triticale

johnmoney05 wrote: »

I think it is illegal.

:rotfl:

Oh, well if you think it is, then it must be!! :doh:

nzseries1

vaporate wrote: »

I'd rather pay a small one off fee than stay paperless.

I do agree that the concept of paperless is a wonderful idea. However until this country gets out of its antiquated system of requiring paper proofs of address, it will never happen.

Errata

vaporate wrote: »

:rotfl:grow up.

Thank you for your suggestion. I suspect I have far, far less growing up to do than you.

vaporate

Errata wrote: »

Thank you for your suggestion. I suspect I have far, far less growing up to do than you.

Not really. Why should I return some poor !!!!!! post when they STEAL mine?

One bad turn deserves another.

nzseries1

I just wanted to say this thread is the best laugh I've had all day. Cheers everyone! :beer:

vaporate

nzseries1 wrote: »

I just wanted to say this thread is the best laugh I've had all day. Cheers everyone! :beer:

lol Likewise.

rainbowfairydust

vaporate wrote: »

Going paperless is a good idea. Such an example like this thread.

I might be wrong, but can't you pay a small fee, like 50p or something to get that one off bit of information? and still stay paperless.

I swear you can.

you are WAY off the amount there. I am with Lloyds TSB , and i have paperless statements . I needed a copy of bank statement (an original copy) and the bank wanted to change me £5 per PEICE of paper.

The fact of the matter is you opened this person's mail on because of something that has happened in the past. Its all a bit tit for tat for my liking.

Regardless of what happened the MATURE thing to have done is send the statement (any future mail) back to the sender. To top this whole thead off you are blaming the post man.

vaporate

rainbowfairydust wrote: »

you are WAY off the amount there. I am with Lloyds TSB , and i have paperless statements . I needed a copy of bank statement (an original copy) and the bank wanted to change me £5 per PEICE of paper.

The fact of the matter is you opened this person's mail on because of something that has happened in the past. Its all a bit tit for tat for my liking.

Regardless of what happened the MATURE thing to have done is send the statement (any future mail) back to the sender. To top this whole thead off you are blaming the post man.

Lloyds is clearly taking the pi$$ with that one.

I would have done the MATURE thing if the other party did the same to me.

:beer:

Debt_Free_Chick

noh wrote: »

It could be.
But what has to be proved is an intention to act to the persons detriment. Which is more difficult to prove.

Intention to deliberately and permanently deprive the recipient of their property and/or information that would be to their benefit???