Tower block of commons

sjaypink

Graham_Devon wrote: »

Yes, and you are entitled to laugh!

1997. It was the catchy theme tune. Plus I was living in yorkshire with my girlfriends family at the time and her mum told me I had to vote labour otherwise she would make me make my own tea! So I voted labour.

This is the problem with letting stupid people have a vote.

Only the right leaning, sensible people should be allowed

Yes! D:ream? Checked trousers?! :cool:

Hmmm, & they right leaning 'sensible' people seemed to have failed to have noticed we've had 2 elections since 97 ?

MrsE_2

The_White_Horse wrote: »

the more i think about these people the more it makes me sick. these people should not get money - they need food stamps that can be redeemed for certain goods in certain supermarkets. there is no need for these people to have dogs or cats. I would like a dog but, despite having a house I don't believe the house is right for a dog. these people have two dogs in a one bedroom flat. there is no need for it. Dog food should not be redeemable under the food stamp scheme. Also, cigarettes and booze should not be allowed. if luxuries are required - work for them. Perhaps the food stamps can be topped up with booze and fag stamps if they do voluntary work.

for people that don't work, they have pretty much every luxury you can think of.

sickening- its about time these people on benefits knew what hardship was.

150 per week is ASDA!????? That is more than I spend and I have a decent job.

Its just iresponsible having two dogs in an already over crowded flat.

Turns my stomach to see benefit money spent on fags, booze, drugs, betting shop, bingo, fake nails, etc etc.....

I couldn't believe her spending £150 a week in Asda, I don't know ANY working households spend that.

sjaypink

MrsE wrote: »

I couldn't believe her spending £150 a week in Asda, I don't know ANY working households spend that.

Waitrose?

Hi MrsE :j

bouche

bo_drinker wrote: »

No. I am not at the computer all day so my response comes when I am.
You completely got the wrong end of the stick with what I said obviously ??

Well, I can only apologise then

Graham_Devon

sjaypink wrote: »

Yes! D:ream? Checked trousers?! :cool:

Hmmm, & they right leaning 'sensible' people seemed to have failed to have noticed we've had 2 elections since 97 ?

That's a very good point.

A very very good point.

So good, I'm a little stuck with a comeback.

To be fair though, I was probably in the pub or something, and at that point politics was for real old fuddy duddy people.

I've now reached fuddy duddy status and I'm darn proud of it

I probably won't be voting tory this time either.

Edit: and why is half of DT here now!?? I came here to run away

MrsE_2

sjaypink wrote: »

Waitrose?

Hi MrsE :j

Seriously I only spend £110 (most but not all of it in Waitrose - they do some cracking deals now & their value range is so good).

Hi

sjaypink

Graham_Devon wrote: »

That's a very good point.

A very very good point.

So good, I'm a little stuck with a comeback.

That would make a good sig.....

Graham_Devon wrote: »

Edit: and why is half of DT here now!?? I came here to run away

I was here first

MrsE wrote: »

Seriously I only spend £110 (most but not all of it in Waitrose - they do some cracking deals now & their value range is so good).

Hi

Yeah but you don't have, like, 5 marrfffs to feed (& £40 quids worth of fags to buy) :cool:

MrsE_2

sjaypink wrote: »

That would make a good sig.....
I was here first

Yeah but you don't have, like, 5 marrfffs to feed (& £40 quids worth of fags to buy) :cool:

But them little kids don't eat much (stop taking the P outta London accents:mad::p)

Graham_Devon

sjaypink wrote: »

That would make a good sig.....

For you? I agree

I was here first

See, classic case of the stupid people! I was so here first, I arrived just before they decided to hide this board from non-members!

MrsE_2

That money is to give their kids a decent home, not have them living in squalor while they smoke & drink it:mad::mad::mad: