We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

where will this end?

189101113

Comments

  • jazzys
    jazzys Posts: 61 Forumite
    I don't understand your remark about people just becoming a medical lawyer?

    I didn't suggest he'd read a comic and became one, he has a masters degree in medical law. I just haven't spoken to him for some years so i didn't know.

    And i'm only repeating what he told me. I have no idea of the ins and outs of the law.

    i take it you have?

    J
    something missing
  • blckbrd
    blckbrd Posts: 454 Forumite
    If I didn't get paid in January - when people are notoriously skint - I'd probably be going off sick with the stress of that alone!
    Opinion, advice and information are different things. Don't be surprised if you receive all 3 in response. :D
  • Uncertain
    Uncertain Posts: 3,901 Forumite
    edited 18 January 2010 at 10:38AM
    jazzys wrote: »
    Just spoke with her again and it comes to light that the reason it hasn't been paid is the sick note was put straight into her "case file" rather than handed to wages.
    saying that, the wages dept is the personnel dept. So obviously someone in there is not doing something right.

    She spoke to acas again this morning and they said to put a letter of grievance in to the employer. However, she wasn't too confident that the lady she spoke to was all that clued up on the correct course of action.

    Personally i'd be knocking someones door off its hinges i think.



    Jazzys

    I'm not clear if they are saying that they deliberately decided not to pay her SSP and CSP for that week or if it was just an administrative mix up?

    If it was the latter they should be able to correct this within a week or so at most. Most large firms have an interim payroll run half way through the month for corrections etc. They are potentially liable for any losses she suffered as a result (bank charges etc).

    If they "decided" not to pay the the options in my previous post apply. Plus, even if the decision was justified (and I don't for one moment think it was) then she should have been told. Again, any losses resulting from this failure.......
  • Uncertain
    Uncertain Posts: 3,901 Forumite
    edited 18 January 2010 at 10:39AM
    jazzys wrote: »
    I also spoke to a friend this morning, not knowing at the time but he turns out to be a medical lawyer these days. He suggested she could almost have a psychiatric injury claim.

    Jazzys

    I think his words "could almost" are the most relevant here. If they push this matter much further, have deliberately withheld pay etc etc then just maybe. In that case, if somebody is willing to give it a go on a true "no win no fee" then why not?
  • jazzys
    jazzys Posts: 61 Forumite
    At this stage i don't know whether they deliberately witheld them or whther it was an admin error. either way she hasn't had any wages, and i believe SSP is classed as wages, for over a month.

    witholding wages is a serious matter but as i say, i'm not sure if it witheld or just overlooked

    J
    something missing
  • Uncertain
    Uncertain Posts: 3,901 Forumite
    edited 18 January 2010 at 12:20PM
    jazzys wrote: »
    At this stage i don't know whether they deliberately witheld them or whther it was an admin error. either way she hasn't had any wages, and i believe SSP is classed as wages, for over a month.

    witholding wages is a serious matter but as i say, i'm not sure if it witheld or just overlooked

    J

    Well she certainly needs to force this particular issue ASAP so that she knows one way or the other (and indeed get the money if it was a mix up).

    Either way, if she has genuinely suffered a loss as a result of not being paid (or not being told that she wouldn't be paid) then she needs to make them aware of this. If it is just a few weeks 0.1% interest in a current account on a couple of hundred quid then it is not worth making an issue about.
  • tigtag02
    tigtag02 Posts: 6,857 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    jazzys wrote: »
    At this stage i don't know whether they deliberately witheld them or whther it was an admin error. either way she hasn't had any wages, and i believe SSP is classed as wages, for over a month.

    witholding wages is a serious matter but as i say, i'm not sure if it witheld or just overlooked

    J

    If the SSP has not been paid in error then its quite likely that the same goes for the CSP - however, as I have stated before CSP can be witheld at the discrestion of the manager (despite Uncertains advice to the contrary).

    Can you speak to the payroll dept or manager or even HR on her behalf to find out exactly whats going on?

    Certainly for the SSP (unless they are going down the HMRC route Zazen mentioned) I would be 'demanding' payment asap.
    :heartpuls baby no3 due 16th November :heartpuls
    TEAM YELLOW
    DFD 16/6/10
    "Shut your gob! Or I'll come round your houses and stamp on all your toys" The ONE, the ONLY, the LEGENDARY Gene Hunt :heart2:
  • Uncertain
    Uncertain Posts: 3,901 Forumite
    tigtag02 wrote: »
    If the SSP has not been paid in error then its quite likely that the same goes for the CSP - however, as I have stated before CSP can be witheld at the discrestion of the manager (despite Uncertains advice to the contrary).

    You keep going on about this point and seem to believe that what you have experienced in some employment contracts / handbooks is universal. Well, I can assure you it is not.

    Your contract / handbook may well have a clause to this effect. My most recent contracts with a couple of large institutions most certainly did not.

    I don't know if this lady's supermarket have something to this effect or not. Do you, or do you just assume what you have experienced must apply to all?

    Either way, let's say they do have a line to the effect of "despite what your doctor may say, our HR department will decide if you are really ill and are going to get CSP or not". You must surely understand that to have any chance of this standing up to challenge this would have to be applied in a fair, equitable and accountable way?

    Given the information we have been told in this thread I cannot see that they have any evidence that could justify such a decision.
  • tigtag02
    tigtag02 Posts: 6,857 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Uncertain wrote: »
    You keep going on about this point and seem to believe that what you have experienced in some employment contracts / handbooks is universal. Well, I can assure you it is not.

    Your contract / handbook may well have a clause to this effect. My most recent contracts with a couple of large institutions most certainly did not.

    I don't know if this lady's supermarket have something to this effect or not. Do you, or do you just assume what you have experienced must apply to all?

    Either way, let's say they do have a line to the effect of "despite what your doctor may say, our HR department will decide if you are really ill and are going to get CSP or not". You must surely understand that to have any chance of this standing up to challenge this would have to be applied in a fair, equitable and accountable way?

    Given the information we have been told in this thread I cannot see that they have any evidence that could justify such a decision.

    MANAGER'S discretion :rolleyes:

    Read the rest of the thread - I'm not alone in this opinion.

    Just out of interest - do you work in the HR or payroll field?
    :heartpuls baby no3 due 16th November :heartpuls
    TEAM YELLOW
    DFD 16/6/10
    "Shut your gob! Or I'll come round your houses and stamp on all your toys" The ONE, the ONLY, the LEGENDARY Gene Hunt :heart2:
  • Uncertain
    Uncertain Posts: 3,901 Forumite
    tigtag02 wrote: »
    MANAGER'S discretion :rolleyes:

    Read the rest of the thread - I'm not alone in this opinion.

    Just out of interest - do you work in the HR or payroll field?

    Just noticed your location under your join date on the left

    CLOUD 9

    Yep, agree with you on that one :T
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.