Letter from FOS

di3004

crawli1 wrote: »

I got nearly 3 pages of explanation - I've kind of given up tbh

Blimey that's a lot.......:eek:

crawli1

I've now got to accept or reject their decision by 22 February 2010

Alpine_Star

crawli1 wrote: »

Hi All,

I have now recieved a Final Decision from the Ombudsman. They are not upholding my complaint against Lloyds TSB :mad:

Alpine Star - I have forwarded their response to you via email.

Thanks for the assistance given.

Thanks - have responded.

VIGILANT22

crawli1 wrote: »

I've now got to accept or reject their decision by 22 February 2010

Are you going to waste more time & effort on a fruitless mission!

chipbeck

VIGILANT22 wrote: »

Are you going to waste more time & effort on a fruitless mission!

Very nice of you to pop on and offer such good advice. I'll PM Premier and see if he'll meet you for a beer!:beer:

natweststaffmember

VIGILANT22 wrote: »

Are you going to waste more time & effort on a fruitless mission!

Explain why since the Supreme Court in their judgement indicates a challenge under Regulation 5(1) in their judgement from November?
The OFT decided that a collective(that means more than 1) challenge was no longer in their interest.
Can you explain what reasoning you have since newer arguments have yet to be tested in a court of law?
Unfortunately, the Supreme Court did not close the door, they close a window and left the door ajar.

crawli1

VIGILANT22 wrote: »

Are you going to waste more time & effort on a fruitless mission!

I'm going to see what Martin and his team come up with and pursue it through court