We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Letter from FOS

124»

Comments

  • di3004
    di3004 Posts: 42,579 Forumite
    crawli1 wrote: »
    I got nearly 3 pages of explanation - I've kind of given up tbh

    Blimey that's a lot.......:eek:
    The one and only "Dizzy Di" :D
  • crawli1
    crawli1 Posts: 146 Forumite
    I've now got to accept or reject their decision by 22 February 2010
  • Alpine_Star
    Alpine_Star Posts: 1,384 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    crawli1 wrote: »
    Hi All,

    I have now recieved a Final Decision from the Ombudsman. They are not upholding my complaint against Lloyds TSB :mad:

    Alpine Star - I have forwarded their response to you via email.

    Thanks for the assistance given.

    Thanks - have responded.
  • VIGILANT22
    VIGILANT22 Posts: 2,516 Forumite
    crawli1 wrote: »
    I've now got to accept or reject their decision by 22 February 2010

    Are you going to waste more time & effort on a fruitless mission!
  • chipbeck
    chipbeck Posts: 1,372 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    VIGILANT22 wrote: »
    Are you going to waste more time & effort on a fruitless mission!


    Very nice of you to pop on and offer such good advice. I'll PM Premier and see if he'll meet you for a beer!:beer:
  • natweststaffmember
    natweststaffmember Posts: 12,063 Forumite
    VIGILANT22 wrote: »
    Are you going to waste more time & effort on a fruitless mission!

    Explain why since the Supreme Court in their judgement indicates a challenge under Regulation 5(1) in their judgement from November?
    The OFT decided that a collective(that means more than 1) challenge was no longer in their interest.
    Can you explain what reasoning you have since newer arguments have yet to be tested in a court of law?
    Unfortunately, the Supreme Court did not close the door, they close a window and left the door ajar.
    I have not worked for NatWest Bank since February 2009

    This username is no longer active.
  • crawli1
    crawli1 Posts: 146 Forumite
    VIGILANT22 wrote: »
    Are you going to waste more time & effort on a fruitless mission!


    I'm going to see what Martin and his team come up with and pursue it through court :D
This discussion has been closed.
★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.2K Life & Family
  • 260.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.
Update Your Picture