Court rules banks can !!!!!! you provided they warn you first

gosnis

What do you expect.
The banking elite rule the roost.
They control how much money is issued, and what its value is.
Which is equivalent to; how many hours you have to work, and what you can afford to buy. In my option that is total control!

Additionally these below facts should be of interest.
Bank of England = Privately Owned Profit Making Company
Federal Reserve = Privately Owned Profit Making Company
Every Court in the UK = Privately Owned Profit Making Company
Every Police Force in the UK = Privately Owned Profit Making Company
Parliament = Privately Owned Profit Making Company
The UK = Privately Owned Profit Making Company
And the list goes on, and on and on...

The above can be proven as fact for anyone wishing to know via D&B - Dun & Bradstreet - "Provider of international and US business credit information".

Wake up folks.

natweststaffmember

gosnis wrote: »

What do you expect.
The banking elite rule the roost.
They control how much money is issued, and what its value is.
Which is equivalent to; how many hours you have to work, and what you can afford to buy. In my option that is total control!

Additionally these below facts should be of interest.
Bank of England = Privately Owned Profit Making Company
Federal Reserve = Privately Owned Profit Making Company
Every Court in the UK = Privately Owned Profit Making Company
Every Police Force in the UK = Privately Owned Profit Making Company
Parliament = Privately Owned Profit Making Company
The UK = Privately Owned Profit Making Company
And the list goes on, and on and on...

The above can be proven as fact for anyone wishing to know via D&B - Dun & Bradstreet - "Provider of international and US business credit information".

Wake up folks.

Your next post will mention the "money as debt" film which has done the rounds for the last couple of years. !!!!!!.

gosnis

natweststaffmember wrote: »

Your next post will mention the "money as debt" film which has done the rounds for the last couple of years. !!!!!!.

I have not actual seen that, I will check it out thanks.

natweststaffmember

gosnis wrote: »

I have not actual seen that, I will check it out thanks.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2550156453790090544#
I'll save you the time..... but honestly, the first post was a day after the Supreme Court decision and to be honest you need to read the press release and the judgement itself and not the media spin to understand that the Supreme Court did not say precisely what is being interpreted as being said.

gosnis

natweststaffmember wrote: »

I'll save you the time..... but honestly, the first post was a day after the Supreme Court decision and to be honest you need to read the press release and the judgement itself and not the media spin to understand that the Supreme Court did not say precisely what is being interpreted as being said.

Thanks for the info and the link.
I do not watch the news nor read papers, they only spout garbage and distort true world and life events.

For anyone interested 'The Money Masters' is defiantly worth watching:
It can be found on Google video.

.

jambosans

gosnis wrote: »

I do not watch the news nor read papers, they only spout garbage and distort true world and life events.

And the unsourced content of Web 2.0 is more credible? Ha.

gosnis

jambosans wrote: »

And the unsourced content of Web 2.0 is more credible? Ha.

Who said anything about unsourced content?
Most of it is simply common sense, follow your intuition rather then the direction of what someone else has told you.

jambosans

gosnis wrote: »

Who said anything about unsourced content?
Most of it is simply common sense, follow your intuition rather then the direction of what someone else has told you.

Well, generally speaking, the vast bulk of information online is unsourced amateur produced content.

Common sense and intuition do not lead to fact. News organisations are a necessary evil, as they have the means to produce a higher quality of content, which allow those not blindly led by mass media to make their own informed decision.

Following common sense and intuition, then finding "Zeitgeist" videos on Google to base an argument in loose "fact", is a poor methodology in forming an opinion. Approaching something with impartiality always allows for a more rounded opinion, and mass media plays a much more crucial role in this than you realise.

gosnis

jambosans wrote: »

Well, generally speaking, the vast bulk of information online is unsourced amateur produced content.

Common sense and intuition do not lead to fact. News organisations are a necessary evil, as they have the means to produce a higher quality of content, which allow those not blindly led by mass media to make their own informed decision.

Following common sense and intuition, then finding "Zeitgeist" videos on Google to base an argument in loose "fact", is a poor methodology in forming an opinion. Approaching something with impartiality always allows for a more rounded opinion, and mass media plays a much more crucial role in this than you realise.

Listen, I’m not going to argue about this that and the other.
We are all welcome to believe whatever we chose to believe.
However, my first post in relation to banking, is fact, provable only if you so choose to see and investigate it yourself.

jambosans

gosnis wrote: »

Listen, I’m not going to argue about this that and the other.

I was merely responding to your rather generalised comment about news media, and wondered where you gained an undistorted view of "true world and life events". I assumed - as you suggested viewing a video online - that the Internet was your source of knowledge, to which I pointed out, is generally considered a poor sole point of reference.

gosnis wrote: »

However, my first post in relation to banking, is fact, provable only if you so choose to see and investigate it yourself.

You strike me as one of these "Tower 7 was blown up by the US Government"* conspiracy kind of people, so I'm not sure how well sourced your post about banking is. To pick you up on one piece of information, according to the Bank of England's own website, it is not privately owned.

As a public organisation, wholly-owned by Government, and with a significant public policy role, the Bank is accountable to Parliament.

Or is this a cover-up?

I'm not trying to mock you, but as I've indicated, you come across very "take the Redpill"* and I generally don't buy into all the sensationalist conspiracy theory nonsense.

*Ironically I have pointed you to an online source, Wikipedia, for more details on these topics. I'm not to fussed about their accuracy as they are rather general pieces of information.