We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Tory cuts could be mighty unpleasant
Comments
-
kennyboy66 wrote: »The other interesting thing is that fiscal policy was tight because of sharp tax increases and just restraint in public spending. Its a bit of a myth that Thatcher cut public spending.
How could she with the size of that dole queue:eek: then again she had all that oil revenue to squander.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
A typical ward will look like this:
1 x Band 7 Manager: £30k - £39k plus shift allowance.
4 x Band 6 Senior Nurses: £25k - £33.5k plus shift allowance.
9 x Band 5 General Nurses: £21k - £26k plus shift allowance.
The one hell of a super ward ... what about the rest of the nurses who make it up, you've only listed the senior & qualified nursing staff, what about the rest, who allow the ward to function.0 -
-
moggylover wrote: »I would agree to some extent, but there are people who go into nursing to NURSE, not to be a manager! Personally I would see dedication to hands on nursing rather than paper-pushing to be something to applaud not criticise with comments regarding competence or ambition.
I thought this as I was reading the (very interesting) details of salary scales and progression possibilities. I think it's wrong to assume that if you're not aiming for the matron/ward manager posts then you lack ambition (and by association are perhaps lazy or less able). Nursing is a vocational profession; people enter it for reasons other than money and power. A parish midwife of 20 years experience may well be worth as much as a 29 year old ward manager- they have just chosen to focus on one area of care and are not interested in people management.
I work in Higher Education, where salary scales are vey rigidly graded, and it is the job that is assessed rather than the person doing it. Although I can see the rationale behind this, the quality of experience becomes devalued. An administrator who's been on campus for 25 years and knows all the security guards, all the receptionists, all the couriers, all the useful ways to get quick answers, can remember who used to do what and where they are now etc etc is a valuable resource.
I could have gone for my line manager's job recently- more money and a bigger office, but the prospect filled me with horror. Utterly thankless job. I don't think that means I'm not ambitious- my aspirations simply lie in a less obvious area than having the word "manager" in my job title.They are an EYESORES!!!!0 -
Old_Slaphead wrote: »What's the likely makeup then ?
I'll ask 'er indoors she was a staff nurse, but now works the odd bank shift mainly on sundays to keep her rcn membership. As you can gauge from the article response from several nurses they appear to suggest the figure to be somewhat inaccurate compared to the reality. Either that or er' indoors is a lying mare.0 -
Tell you what, if you are ever in hospital for an operation we will get the doctor with two months experience to do it, I will have the one with twenty years experience
would you rather have a 65 year old doctor with 40 years of experience perform delicate surgery on you or a 48 year old doctor with 23 years of experience?0 -
The_White_Horse wrote: »would you rather have a 65 year old doctor with 40 years of experience perform delicate surgery on you or a 48 year old doctor with 23 years of experience?
I will take the 65 year old (as long as he has had his/her eyes lazered) you take the one with two months experience.
'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
0
-
I've already submitted that link as evidence in posting #163, m'lud.0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards