MSE News: Row erupts over rushed-through broadband tax plans

This is the discussion thread for the following MSE News Story:

"Government plans to legislate on its controversial broadband tax before the next general election have sparked angry criticism ..."


OfficialStamp.gif
«1

Replies

  • wizk1wizk1 Forumite
    911 Posts
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts
    ✭✭✭
    This is BT's job. Why should we have to pay a tax to pay for something that BT will inevitably charge us over the odds for when it goes live?
  • I totally agree with wizk1....

    Where I live (in Lincolnshire) we BARELY get a service that you can call broadband, it is so slow and the infrastructure is so poor. Why do I have to pay more money for that kind of service? I'm already paying the same price for my broadband as someone who gets MUCH faster service.

    What a con! I knew that these wildly extravagant plans for this amazing broadband service that the whole of the UK was going to get would turn into some money making scheme....

    Makes me really angry. There are many places in the developing world that have better connection to the internet than many of us in the UK do. What an embarrassment
  • penrhynpenrhyn Forumite
    15.2K Posts
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Message to Gordon.

    You have sat too long for any good you have been doing lately ... Depart, I say; and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go!
    That gum you like is coming back in style.
  • CrabmanCrabman Forumite
    9.9K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts I'm a Volunteer Board Guide Combo Breaker
    ✭✭✭✭
    If it's a tax then BT should not make any profit (unless they decide to do the work at cost price, which seems unlikely).

    BT is a private company, they should upgrade their network using private finance, so that the profits then go back to the private sector.

    If BT, unable to fund its own work, requires an external investor (the taxpayer) to finance investment, it is only right that the investor gets a share of the profit.

    I've not yet seen an episode of Dragons' Den where someone is offered investment in exchange for 0% equity. This is effectively what is happening with the broadband 'tax'.
    I'm a Board Guide on the Savings & Investments, ISAs & Tax-free Savings, Public Transport & Cycling, Motoring and Parking Fines, Tickets & Parking Boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Board Guides are not moderators & don't read every post. If you spot a contentious or illegal post then please report it to [email protected] (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com

  • If everyone decides to boycott the Internet for a couple of days, there would be no shopping or spending money. I think they might think twice before taxing us to use it
  • edited 24 September 2009 at 1:20PM
    reduxredux Forumite
    22.8K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited 24 September 2009 at 1:20PM
    What this charge shows most of all is that the government is in a totally confused position about free markets in telecoms.

    For some time, the networks have supplied broadband a lot cheaper to places where there is more competition after local loop unbundling.

    Can it really be true for example to suggest that it is £5 to £8 a month cheaper at the moment to provide broadband to somewhere a mile and a half away from me, merely because the cables head in a different direction to a different exchange? Where does the infrastructure meet on the other side of the exchanges?

    No, besides BT there is only one other provider at my exchange, so rivals deem that the market isn't competitive. If there were two more, suddenly loads of companies would be willing to offer me even resold BT Wholesale for £5 or £6 less. But surely the presence or lack of those others scarcely alters BT Wholesale's costs at all, only the costs of the other firms installing their gear.

    In other words, I think the market is wilfully distorted already, without the phone companies being handed the chance to blackmail the government.

    If the government really wants to socialise things a bit, it should compel the companies to charge more even prices across the whole country, and a bit more not less for the better products, and use that to sponsor the rollout costs in the places they've avoided so far.

    Charging people 50p more, when they have rubbish or no broadband at all yet, and they know people elsewhere with fast products are paying £5 or £10 less, is going to seem unfair.
  • mrJ_5mrJ_5 Forumite
    1.1K Posts
    Who said it will go to BT? The news article didn't say BT.... anything to do with broadband is BT's fault it seems....
  • smcaulsmcaul Forumite
    1.1K Posts
    And there was me thinking Gordon Brown had run out of nails for his coffin, seems he found some more!!!!!
  • Why the hell should my 80 year old mother pay a extra £6 a year to subsidise broadband that she does not have, never will have and is not in the tiny bit interested in having :mad:
  • hillcatshillcats Forumite
    899 Posts
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Photogenic
    ✭✭✭
    They are having a giggle... :shocked:
    ORIGINAL MORTGAGE AMOUNT £106,454.00 (Started Sept 2007)
    NOV 2021 O/S AMOUNT £1,694.41 OUR DEBT REDUCED BY £104,759.59 by std regular, over-payments & off-setting.
    BofE +0.19% Tracker Repayment Offset Mortgage Discounted Sept 07-10 then increased to BofE +0.62% until 2027
This discussion has been closed.
Latest MSE News and Guides