We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Police traffic car on bypass fly over, Q?
Options
Comments
-
They may have been dunkin donuts.
Ken.That's my mutt in the picture above.0 -
Lol. I don't watch it regularly cuz I don't have sky but its on sky1 I believe.0
-
harveybobbles wrote: »You and your STi's. I mean ST's...
Well they won't have the RS will they? Not enough to go round.. :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
Hope I've not started something again by mentioning it....
Got shot down big time last time! Genie
Master Technician0 -
-
I don't know!!!!!!!! I'd guess 9pm some time?0
-
sebdangerfield wrote: »Some forces still use traffic cars on bridges to trap speeders but not often at all anymore as it's a poor use of resourses when a civy in a van can do a similar job for a lot less.
That said, to know for certain you'll have to wait for the NIP, notice of intended prosecution to come through, normaly by post. It must be served within 14 days of the offence so 14 days is the limit, forget postage times and whatever else has been said.
The car may well have been using pro laser or similar which is basicaly a radar gun, if this is the case the officer would have stopped you and given a verbal NIP and ticket or report you for summons if it was deemed you were going to fast.
Regarding the post above, vascar is a system used inside the car to work out speed using a simple time over distance calculation so speeders can be followed, lost sight of and then located again and the average speed can be used against them. The white marks in the road are used to calibrate the machine, not catch speeders.
You are so wrong, it only needs to be actioned within 14 days:rolleyes:I like the thanks button, but ,please, an I agree button.
Will the grammar and spelling police respect I do make grammatical errors, and have carp spelling, no need to remind me.;)
Always expect the unexpected:eek:and then you won't be dissapointed0 -
well ive not heard anything yet......0
-
Well, keep your head down for a few more days yet;)I like the thanks button, but ,please, an I agree button.
Will the grammar and spelling police respect I do make grammatical errors, and have carp spelling, no need to remind me.;)
Always expect the unexpected:eek:and then you won't be dissapointed0 -
You are so wrong, it only needs to be actioned within 14 days:rolleyes:
If I am, i'd better get a new job!
The following lifted directly from Jane's....
What is the 14 day rule?
The 14 day rule relates only to the period of time in which the Police/Process Unit must serve the original Notice. In many cases, the registered keeper will be a lease company not the actual driver with the result that even if the driver is unaware of the incident, service of the Notice is good if it was sent to arrive at the registered keeper's last known address within 14 days of the offence.0 -
I'm pretty sure you're right as well.sebdangerfield wrote: »If I am, i'd better get a new job!
The following lifted directly from Jane's....
What is the 14 day rule?
The 14 day rule relates only to the period of time in which the Police/Process Unit must serve the original Notice. In many cases, the registered keeper will be a lease company not the actual driver with the result that even if the driver is unaware of the incident, service of the Notice is good if it was sent to arrive at the registered keeper's last known address within 14 days of the offence.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards