We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Is this ticket valid
Comments
-
-
But the OP has admitted they parked on yellow linessarahg1969 wrote: »Because maybe it's not correct? That's reasonable, isn't it?
I don't see how he/she can then complain about a ticket
Keen photographer with sales in the UK and abroad.
Willing to offer advice on camera equipment and photography if i can!0 -
But the OP has admitted they parked on yellow lines

I don't see how he/she can then complain about a ticket
The picture clearly shows that the yellow lines fade out. Hence it is not known if the restriction at that location still exists as it is not compliantly signed.
If restriction is intended and is still noted in the Traffic Regulation Order for the location then surely the Council would have maintained the lines.
More pics would help, as someone said.0 -
-
So if you parked on yellow lines, paid the fine and then found that the council had put them down without legislation and so were refunding money, you would not ask for it back? We are just trying to make sure its right before paying.But the OP has admitted they parked on yellow lines
I don't see how he/she can then complain about a ticketI'd rather be an Optimist and be proved wrong than a Pessimist and be proved right.0 -
peter_the_piper wrote: »So if you parked on yellow lines, paid the fine and then found that the council had put them down without legislation and so were refunding money, you would not ask for it back? We are just trying to make sure its right before paying.
Yes I would...but that's not what the OP asked.
The OP asked if the ticket was valid on the basis of faded/broken yellow lines.....but admitted they parked on them.
I'm suggesting that by admitting the lines were there, it therefore means they're visible and I'm unsure how the arguement will stand up if they complain to the council that they're faded. The council will not unreasonably reply saying they're visible....and they are because the OP saw them and admitted parking on them.
Your example isn't accurate at all - we don't know if the council is refunding tickets......nor do we know if the legislation is in place.
The question was asked - I parked on yellow lines but they're faded - can I dodge the ticket.
I'd reply - no - the lines may be faded, but if you knew you were parked on them then they're not so faded to be invisible.
Photo 2 clearly shows the end of the yellows under the bumper - further evidence that they're not so faded to be invisible.
I'm all for arguing a case and fighting for my corner but I don't think you can say "I parked on yellow lines but they're faded so can i dodge the ticket?"
Keen photographer with sales in the UK and abroad.
Willing to offer advice on camera equipment and photography if i can!0 -
I'm all for arguing a case and fighting for my corner but I don't think you can say "I parked on yellow lines but they're faded so can i dodge the ticket?"
Clearly you "think" wrongly because people can say that. In fact you just did above. Easy isn't it? If a restriction requires a specific set of signs/road painting in order to be valid then it can't be enforced if any part of the signage or whatever is missing.If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything0 -
RobertoMoir wrote: »Clearly you "think" wrongly because people can say that. In fact you just did above. Easy isn't it? If a restriction requires a specific set of signs/road painting in order to be valid then it can't be enforced if any part of the signage or whatever is missing.
Maybe you should read the first two cases of this website then.
Also what would be the situation if there was 6inches of snow covering the ground? does that render the lines useless because they're not visible?
What about a channel/gutter that's full of leaves or litter? Are those lines to be ignored too?
Faded or not - they were clear enough for the OP to see them and admit parking on them.....I don't see what the issue is here.
If there are/were no signs to enforce the order then that's a different ball game....but the OP didn't ask that and has made no mention of a lack of signs...so the assumption is that they are there and clearly visible.
Keen photographer with sales in the UK and abroad.
Willing to offer advice on camera equipment and photography if i can!0 -
As Peter explained, NOT specifically for pavement parking. Only for obstruction which is a different matter and covered by different legislation.
-
Similarly you could theoretically be prosecuted under numerous offences for driving on the pavement, typically careless driving, as you have to drive on the pavement to get on and off.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards